Several of a certain bank's top executives have recently been purchasing shares in their own bank. This activity has occasioned some surprise, since it is widely believed that the bank, carrying a large number of bad loans, is on the brink of collapse. Since the executives are well placed to know their bank's true condition, it might seem that their share purchases show that the danger of collapse is exaggerated. However, the available information about the bank's condition is from reliable and informed sources, and corporate executives do sometimes buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to calm worries about their company's condition. On balance, therefore, it is likely that the executives of the bank are following this example.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
The first describes the circumstance the explanation of which is the issue that the argument addresses; the second states the main conclusion of the argument.
The first describes the circumstance the explanation of which is the issue the argument addresses; the second states a conclusion that is drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the argument.
The first provides evidence to defend the position that the argument seeks to establish against opposing positions; the second states the main conclusion of the argument.
The first provides evidence to support the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second states a conclusion that is drawn in order to support the argument's main conclusion.
Each provides evidence to support the position that the argument seeks to establish.
注意分清conclusion 和 main conclusion, 文章最后一句也就是bf2肯定是main conclusion, 1. therefore关键词 ; 2. 文章的重心是解释为什么银行会这么做,而不是要讨论这个银行的状况究竟如何,是存是亡,所以最后一句就是总结论--银行这么做不过是在效仿之前的例子(为了消除民众担忧)。
黑脸1:某家银行的高管最近在买自家的股票。 fact,高管的购买行为背后的动机是整个argument想要讨论的内容
黑脸2:main conclusion- 作者认为的这个行为背后的真正动机
选项都看不懂难怪错了
事实不能用来捍卫观点?
1只是个fact 是整个CR试图去explain的
选的B,第二段就已经是conclusion了,怎么会是拿来support conclusion的呢!!!!错
没有读懂选项