Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?
The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument's advocacy of a particular strategy.
The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.
first bf is the overall goal. then they present two strategies to achieve the goal : buy the land /modernize
the second bf provides the basis
d. ("这里第一句说对了。就是一个goal,只不过有两种plan,1.是国家买 2.是农民继续使用,就是不给用作居民区的发展。第二句,说是对一个特别的策略的支持。也是对的,第二个bold face是plan2成立的基础。如果农民觉的土地是可以养活的就永远不会卖,这样的话,就不会用做居民区了。然后说了一下农业现代化和土地养活他们自己之间的关系。")
b. 1. the goal can be attained by 2nd strategy.
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论