Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?
The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument's advocacy of a particular strategy.
The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.
BF1是一个goal,为了实现这个goal 提出了一个strategy就是purchasing farm。这个strategy被评价成两个方面。
一方面评价不好ill-conceived,如果farmers卖地造成恶意竞价。
另一方面,BF2 里strategy has been judged 是大多farmers不愿意卖地,因为farming是可行的。但是,要前提满足现代化。因此,BF2造成了提倡(providing a basis for)只有sensible preservation strategy能帮助farmers实现现代化从而实现farming 的可行性。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论