When storing Renaissance oil paintings, museums conform to standards that call for careful control of the surrounding temperature and humidity, with variations confined within narrow margins. Maintaining this environment is very costly, and recent research shows that even old oil paint is unaffected by wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity. Therefore, museums could relax their standards and save money without endangering their Renaissance oil paintings.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
Renaissance paintings were created in conditions involving far greater fluctuations in temperature and humidity than those permitted by current standards.
Under the current standards that museums use when storing Renaissance oil paintings, those paintings do not deteriorate at all.
Museum collections typically do not contain items that are more likely to be vulnerable to fluctuations in temperature and humidity than Renaissance oil paintings.
None of the materials in Renaissance oil paintings other than the paint are vulnerable enough to relatively wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity to cause damage to the paintings.
Most Renaissance oil paintings are stored in museums located in regions near the regions where the paintings were created.
c选项:Museum collections扩大了主体范围,而题目关心的只是Renaissance oil paintings.
D选项:
①油画中的paint不会受到影响,当温度和湿度受到很大影响的时候
②博物馆应该放松他们的标准,而且这样做也不会危机到油画
gap:paint不受影响==》油画不受影响
油画除了paint还有其他东西啊
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论