In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.
Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?
A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.
Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.
Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.
Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or, another sled.
Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.
求详解
我的理解是,因为塑料雪橇适用的雪况多,所以受伤人数也就增多了。
果因推理
前提(果):现在受伤人数更多
结论(因):塑料更危险
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论