Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?
The expansion of large-scale farming in Africa and Asia has destroyed much of the natural vegetation on which elephants have historically depended, forcing them to turn to cultivated land to satisfy their enormous appetites. As a result, farmers have lost millions of dollars worth of crops annually. Yet even if elephant sanctuaries were created on a widespread basis to guarantee elephants sufficient natural vegetation, the raiding would likely persist, since .
when elephants forage for food, they typically travel in herds.
Foraging elephants have been known to cause substantial damage even to plants that they do not eat.
Some of the land where crops have suffered extensive damage from elephants has been allowed to return to its natural state.
Elephants tend to prefer cultivated crops to wild vegetation as a food source.
Elephant sanctuaries are usually created in areas that are rich in the natural vegetation on which elephants have historically depended.
大规模农业化-破坏自然植物-大象的食物减少-强迫他们吃庄稼
计划:大象庇护所的建立可以提供足够多的植物给他们吃
结论:计划无效,袭击还是会发生
B.袭击还会继续因为即使大象不吃庄稼了依旧来回跑破坏。
D 比起野生植物,大象更加喜欢庄稼。
两个选项都会导致破坏
在看下结论:the raiding would likely persist. 这里的raiding袭击指的是大象吃庄稼造成的农民伯伯的损失惨重。
B不吃庄稼肯定比还要吃的损失小,应该不能构成raiding
D题目中说是农业扩张了,以前大象没有吃过庄稼,吃过后发现他们prefer庄稼than野生植物,即使有了庇护所,他们依旧会像以前一样。
D
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论