Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?
The expansion of large-scale farming in Africa and Asia has destroyed much of the natural vegetation on which elephants have historically depended, forcing them to turn to cultivated land to satisfy their enormous appetites. As a result, farmers have lost millions of dollars worth of crops annually. Yet even if elephant sanctuaries were created on a widespread basis to guarantee elephants sufficient natural vegetation, the raiding would likely persist, since .
when elephants forage for food, they typically travel in herds.
Foraging elephants have been known to cause substantial damage even to plants that they do not eat.
Some of the land where crops have suffered extensive damage from elephants has been allowed to return to its natural state.
Elephants tend to prefer cultivated crops to wild vegetation as a food source.
Elephant sanctuaries are usually created in areas that are rich in the natural vegetation on which elephants have historically depended.
B项 觅食的大象会对他们即使不吃的植物也会造成损害。这个是无论大象吃不吃庄稼都客观存在的,即使大规模农业化之前也存在,所以并不是造成农民损失的原因,造成损失的原因应该是从不吃庄稼到吃庄稼。然后损失继续也是因为吃庄稼,所以选D
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论