Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?
The expansion of large-scale farming in Africa and Asia has destroyed much of the natural vegetation on which elephants have historically depended, forcing them to turn to cultivated land to satisfy their enormous appetites. As a result, farmers have lost millions of dollars worth of crops annually. Yet even if elephant sanctuaries were created on a widespread basis to guarantee elephants sufficient natural vegetation, the raiding would likely persist, since .
when elephants forage for food, they typically travel in herds.
Foraging elephants have been known to cause substantial damage even to plants that they do not eat.
Some of the land where crops have suffered extensive damage from elephants has been allowed to return to its natural state.
Elephants tend to prefer cultivated crops to wild vegetation as a food source.
Elephant sanctuaries are usually created in areas that are rich in the natural vegetation on which elephants have historically depended.
大象去吃农民种植的庄稼,现在即使建造大象庇护所提供给它们充分的自然植物,对农作物的破坏依然会继续。问explain
choice a,当大象觅食的时候,它们成群结队出行。-> 没法解释为什么明明提供了自然植物,会继续去吃庄稼
choice b, 进食中的大象对它们不感兴趣的植物也造成破坏。irrelevant
choice d, 比起自然植物,大象更喜欢将农作物当食物。correct
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论