Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?
The expansion of large-scale farming in Africa and Asia has destroyed much of the natural vegetation on which elephants have historically depended, forcing them to turn to cultivated land to satisfy their enormous appetites. As a result, farmers have lost millions of dollars worth of crops annually. Yet even if elephant sanctuaries were created on a widespread basis to guarantee elephants sufficient natural vegetation, the raiding would likely persist, since .
when elephants forage for food, they typically travel in herds.
Foraging elephants have been known to cause substantial damage even to plants that they do not eat.
Some of the land where crops have suffered extensive damage from elephants has been allowed to return to its natural state.
Elephants tend to prefer cultivated crops to wild vegetation as a food source.
Elephant sanctuaries are usually created in areas that are rich in the natural vegetation on which elephants have historically depended.
重点: the raiding would persist. raiding指turn to cultivated land to satisfy their appetite =raiding指的是继续吃庄稼
B.大象会破坏它们不吃的植物
如果B成立需要证明:
1. 吃庇护所的植物的路上或附近会经过庄稼地,即需要证明大象破坏的是庄稼
2. persist 说明是和之前一致的行为,之前是吃庄稼现在只踩着玩,并不是一个连续行为
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论