Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best candidates to the job. The legislature's move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.
Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect.
Pat's response to Mel is inadequate in that it
attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change.
attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects.
simply denies Mel's claim without putting forward any evidence in support of that denial .
assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group necessarily benefit all members of that group.
A 这个政策的目的是为了提升法官职位的竞争者的质量,所以P拿现在在任的法官去评价潜在的,未来的影响是肯定不对的,所以得选A
B 错误的把改变的原因当成改变的影响,文中没提到,排除
C 靠不提到消极影响来认为某个改变有积极影响,文中没提到,排除
D 直接反驳M的话且不提供证据,P说现在的法官几乎不教课就是证据,故排除D
E 假设对大多数人有效的改变对所有人都有效,混淆选项,一定要注意这个政策是对潜在的竞争者所制定的,和已经进入法官这个职业的人无关
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论