扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATLA-CR-85
Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best candidates to the job. The legislature's move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.
Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect.
Pat's response to Mel is inadequate in that it
attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change.
attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects.
simply denies Mel's claim without putting forward any evidence in support of that denial .
assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group necessarily benefit all members of that group.
一定要明白好题意
M说因为工资低吸引不来优秀的人才（要注意这里的优秀人才是指潜在的，未来可能会进入法官行业的人，但并不是现在以在从事这个行业的人）且政府即使提高了工资，也不会有多大作用，因为会禁止法官们考演讲和授课赚钱
P反驳说，提高工资会有用，因为现在的法官很少会去通过演讲和教课赚钱，所以这个ban无效
P的话有漏洞是因为他在已现在的法官不会去演讲和教课来推断潜在的那些优秀人才，未来法官也不会这样干，所以这点是不对的
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论