Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best candidates to the job. The legislature's move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.
Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect.
Pat's response to Mel is inadequate in that it
attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change.
attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects.
simply denies Mel's claim without putting forward any evidence in support of that denial .
assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group necessarily benefit all members of that group.
M说法官的工资太低了,吸引不了最优秀的人来工作。涨薪也不行,因为禁止法官有偿授课。
P就说涨薪能解决问题的,因为很少有法官去授课。
问P的说法有哪方面的不足。
A P是基于现在的情况来做的预估。 现在没法官出去授课,是因为现在就禁止有偿上课啊。it was coupled with a ban ...
B 因果搞反了。这里没说到因果,说的是某一个方案有没有效果。
C 因为支出了没有副作用,所以方案有用。
D 只是反对M的说法,没给出论据。给出理由了。
E 对大多数人有用就是对所有人有用。没提到。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论