扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATLA-CR-89
Consumers planning to buy recreational equipment tend to buy higher quality, more expensive equipment when the economy is strong than when it is weak. Hill and Dale is a business that sells high-quality, expensive camping and hiking equipment in Boravia. Although all the signs are that Boravia's economy is now entering a period of sustained strength, the managers of the business do not expect a substantial increase in sales.
Which of the following, if true, would provide the strongest justification for the managers' judgment?
A significant proportion of Hill and Dale's sales are made to customers who enter the store in order to buy one particular item but, once there, find other items to buy as well.
In Boravia when the economy is strong, those who might otherwise go camping tend to take vacations overseas.
The economic upturn is likely to allow Boravia's national parks, where most of the camping and hiking is done, to receive extra funding to improve their visitor facilities.
Advances in materials technology have led to the development of hiking and camping equipment that is more comfortable and lightweight than before.
Many people in Boravia not only are committed to preserving the country's wilderness areas but also are interested in spending some time in them.
求解B啊 这道题不知道选什么觉得都没有关系... 就算出国玩了不是也需要买装备吗？因为出国玩所以装备就一定要在国外再买吗？
试着解答一下：我解题的思路是A/D/E首先排除了，明显不对，看B/C：
B： 说不在本国出行了，都去国外了，那么有很大的可能的潜台词是国外就不需要买这些装备了，可能不是hiking,也可能租装备
C：说加强公园的设施建设，但是如果是加强设施建设，那么结果是会有更多的人去公园hiking啊，那么就会更可能买装备。
相比较B和C，B不买装备的理由更充分，C买装备的理由更充分，所以B比C好。
可以解答你的问题吗？
otherwise go camping，已经明说了不会camping了，（即使国外度假也不会camping的意思
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
我觉得这道题目就别争了，我在有些地方看到答案是C，有些地方答案是B，解释都比较牵强，也都有点道理。当然，最重要的是通过题目学会如何思考就可以了。
Consumers planning to buy recreational equipment tend to buy higher quality, more expensive equipment when the economy is strong than when it is weak.这个作为前提的逻辑关系并没有限定在Boravia