Plankton generally thrive in areas of the ocean with sufficient concentrations of certain nitrogen compounds near the surface, where plankton live. Nevertheless, some areas, though rich in these nitrogen compounds, have few plankton. These areas have particularly low concentrations of iron, and oceanographers hypothesize that this shortage of iron prevents plankton from thriving. However, an experimental release of iron compounds into one such area failed to produce a thriving plankton population, even though local iron concentrations increased immediately.
Which of the following, if true, argues most strongly against concluding, on the basis of the information above, that the oceanographers' hypothesis is false?
Not all of the nitrogen compounds that are sometimes found in relatively high concentrations in the oceans are nutrients for plankton.
Certain areas of the ocean support an abundance of plankton despite having particularly low concentrations of iron.
The release of the iron compounds did not increase the supply of nitrogen compounds in the area.
A few days after the iron compounds were released, ocean currents displaced the iron-rich water from the surface.
The iron compounds released into the area occur naturally in areas of the ocean where plankton thrive.
注意问法,双重否定argue against...false所以是要加强oceangraphers的观点
这些人观点的推理方式是相关-因果 因为iron 数量有关系 所以推断 因果 是iron作用--数量 D是他因 解释了题目为啥iron不产生作用 实质上意思就是iron有作用
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论