Plankton generally thrive in areas of the ocean with sufficient concentrations of certain nitrogen compounds near the surface, where plankton live. Nevertheless, some areas, though rich in these nitrogen compounds, have few plankton. These areas have particularly low concentrations of iron, and oceanographers hypothesize that this shortage of iron prevents plankton from thriving. However, an experimental release of iron compounds into one such area failed to produce a thriving plankton population, even though local iron concentrations increased immediately.
Which of the following, if true, argues most strongly against concluding, on the basis of the information above, that the oceanographers' hypothesis is false?
Not all of the nitrogen compounds that are sometimes found in relatively high concentrations in the oceans are nutrients for plankton.
Certain areas of the ocean support an abundance of plankton despite having particularly low concentrations of iron.
The release of the iron compounds did not increase the supply of nitrogen compounds in the area.
A few days after the iron compounds were released, ocean currents displaced the iron-rich water from the surface.
The iron compounds released into the area occur naturally in areas of the ocean where plankton thrive.
我觉得可以这样理解:证明这个实验结果有错误或缺陷,都是在排除不相关的因素,反而都是在证实假设。所以D为假设排除了一个不相关的结论,正确
如果符合正常假设结果,那就是加入Iron,此时水域Iron含量高,Plankron数量也会多,但是实际没有,否定了假设。但是相反,如果此时Iron含量低,那Plankron的数量也少的话就能解释假设了。那么就得寻找加入Iron后,它含量还低的其他原因了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论