Historians who study European women of the Renaissance try to measure "independence", "options", and other indicators of the degree to which the expression of women's individuality was either permitted or suppressed. Influenced by Western individualism, these historians define a peculiar form of personhood: an innately bounded unit, autonomous and standing apart from both nature and society. An anthropologist, however, would contend that a person can be conceived in ways other than as an "individual." In many societies a person's identity is not intrinsically unique and self-contained but instead is defined within a complex web of social relationships.
In her study of the fifteenth-century Florentine widow Alessandra Strozzi, a historian who specializes in European women of the Renaissance attributes individual intention and authorship of actions to her subject. This historian assumes that Alessandra had goals and interests different from those of her sons, yet much of the historian's own research reveals that Alessandra acted primarily as a champion of her sons' interests, taking their goals as her own. Thus Alessandra conforms more closely to the anthropologist's notion that personal motivation is embedded in a social context. Indeed, one could argue that Alessandra did not distinguish her personhood from that of her sons. In Renaissance Europe the boundaries of the conceptual self were not always firm and closed and did not necessarily coincide with the boundaries of the bodily self.
The passage suggests that the historian mentioned in the second paragraph would be most likely to agree with which of the following assertions regarding Alessandra Strozzi?
Alessandra was able to act more independently than most women of her time because she was a widow.
Alessandra was aware that her personal motivation was embedded in a social context.
Alessandra had goals and interests similar to those of many other widows in her society.
Alessandra is an example of a Renaissance woman who expressed her individuality through independent action.
Alessandra was exceptional because she was able to effect changes in the social constraints placed upon women in her society.
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 B。这是因为文章提到,研究15世纪佛罗伦萨寡妇艾莱珊卓茜的历史学家假设艾莱珊卓茜有不同于她儿子的目标和兴趣,但历史学家自己的研究表明,艾莱珊卓茜主要是作为她儿子的支持者,将他们的目标作为自己的目标。因此,艾莱珊卓茜更符合人类学家关于个人动机嵌入社会背景的概念。因此,选项B最接近历史学家对艾莱珊卓茜的理解,即艾莱珊卓茜知道自己的个人动机是嵌入社会背景的。
文中出现the historian的句子:
a historian who specializes in European women of the Renaissance attributes individual intention and authorship of actions to her subject.
因此推断,例子中的女性是独立的,选D
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论