Critical-thinking instruction is predicted on two assumptions: that there are clearly identifiable thinking skills that students can be taught to recognize and apply appropriately, and if recognized and applied, students will become more effective thinkers.
if recognized and applied, students
if these skills are recognized and applied, that students
if students recognize and apply them, that they
that if recognized and applied, students
that if students recognize and apply these skills, they
题目分析:本题的结构有点特殊,很多同学可能会认为“冒号”身后的连词that有点奇怪,但实际上,assumption身后其实是assumption的同位语从句。这个冒号本身是可有可无的。从意思上来说,我们可以认为有两个assumption,第一个假设是有一些明显的学生们可以被教会的思考技术,第二个假设是如果学生们掌握或者应用了它们,学生会变成更有效的一个思考者。
选项分析:
选项A:本选项没有语法错误,if身后的recognized和applied是过去分词,if recognized and applied是伴随状语。但过去分词表达的是被动语态,学生们(students)是主动去应用和识别,不能是被应用和被识别。
选项B:that的位置不对。if students recognize and apply these skills, they will become more effective thinkers是two assumptions之一,因此,应该将其作为assumption的同位语从句,即,在整个句子身前加that。
选项C:本选项错误同选项(B)。
选项D:本选项错误同选项(A)。
选项E:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
我觉得B选项的问题不在that, 因为前面的if-状语从句不影响主干,可以把状语省去不看?
倒是if these skills are recognized and applied, that students的表达,意思是如果这些技能被认可和应用,学生就会变成更高效的思考者。这里没有逻辑主语一说的话,那么漏洞在于,技能被用了,而没有指明是谁用了,学生就可以改变; C我觉得问题是用了them 和they 来指代两个不同的对象。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论