In contrast to environmentalists' proposals to limit emissions of certain pollutants, the administration proposed calling for mandatory restrictions of only three such pollutants from power plants-mercury, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides and the plan would delay such cuts until 2010 or later.
administration proposed calling for mandatory restriction of
administration proposed a call for mandatory restrictions, including those for
administration, proposing mandatory restrictions on
administration's proposal was a call for mandatory restrictions, which include
administration's proposal would call for mandatory restrictions on
题目分析:
本题主要考查了“比较”和一些词汇的用法。
选项分析:
A选项:比较对象的不对等。句首的in contrast to要求对比两者必须保证在逻辑上可比。能和“环境学员的方法”相对比的只能是“管理员们的方法”,不能是管理员本身。
B选项:本选项错误同选项(A)。
C选项:本选项错误同选项(A)。另外,本选项没有谓语动词。
D选项:分析本选项主干可知,其讲的是“administration's proposal是一个call”(此处,was是系动词,a call是名词,做表语)。但在逻辑上,应该是administration's proposal发出call for(需要)这个动作,即,管理员们的方法需要强制的限制,而不能说,管理员们的方法是一个call。
E选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
D应该是 3 restrinctions 应该 include restriction1 on A, r2 onB, r3 on C ,而不是直接restrinction on A B C
E直接说禁止了(restrictions on)ABC是可以的
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论