Research during the past several decades on the nature of language and the processes that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity.
that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity
of producing and understanding it have revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity
by which it is produced and understood has revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity
by which it is produced and understood have revealed great complexity rather than underlying simplicity
by which one produces and understands it have revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity
题目分析:
略。
选项分析:
A选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
B选项:本选项具有“主谓一致”的错误。整个句子的主语是一个单数名词——research,所以其谓语动词也应该用单数以保证体态一致,应该用has revealed,而不是have revealed。
C选项:本选项的主要问题在于by which it is produced and understood这个定语从句。先行词process在从句中做by身后的对象,放进定语从句则有:
language is produced by process and is understood by process.
and前的部分和选项A相同,主被动之间可认为没什么区别。但and身后的部分不对。过程不能发出“理解语言”这一动作,只能让语言变得可以理解。
D选项:by which身后的定语从句错误同选项(C)。主谓一致错误同选项(B)。
E选项:it指代错误同选项(C)。主谓一致错误同选项(B)。
代词it在逻辑上应该指代语言,而“语言(language)”是在所有格定语中(of language),因此该代词只能指代起源(nature),而不是语言
兄弟,你有看前面的解释吗。。。 这很明显在扯淡啊 是 process和by 搭配错了
感谢指正!其实这题我对了 就是感觉他解释的挺新鲜...就备注下...没想到还是有点扯谈的解释...
嗯 我就想提醒一下,怕你被误导。个人觉得sc,不管做对做错,事后每个题的每个选项都要仔细分析一下,这样才能把最大化题目的作用。
那请问一下这个指代到底有没有问题啊??
毕出这个解释不走心,乱来的。A也有it
感觉是被动式的原因吧?it was produced?
抱歉解释有误,现已更新。
感谢指正,解析现已更新。但,GMAT考试从来不考查搭配,by本身和process的搭配也并无错误。
和主被动没有关系,解析已更新。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论