The Environmental Protection Agency's proposal to place restrictions on both diesel fuel and diesel engines has sparked a counterattack by the oil industry, saying that the move will exacerbate the nation's fuel supply problems.
on both diesel fuel and diesel engines has sparked a counterattack by the oil industry, saying
on both diesel fuel and engines have sparked the oil industry to counterattack, and they say
on both diesel fuel and diesel engines has sparked a counterattack by the oil industry, which says
both on diesel fuel and engines has sparked the oil industry to a counterattack, saying
both on diesel fuel and diesel engines have sparked the oil industry to counterattack, and it says
EPA的提案对柴油发动机和柴油进行限制,受到了oil industry 的反对,因为他们认为这样的move(即place restrictions)会恶化国内的supply
对!这句话的重心是放在后面oil industry的counterattack!登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
EPA的提案对柴油发动机和柴油进行限制,受到了oil industry 的反对,因为他们认为这样的move(即place restrictions)会恶化国内的supply
choice a, saying作为句末的结果/伴随状语往前修饰最近的动词has sparked,导致say的主语变成了proposal。语意错误,根据逻辑应该是oil industry发出了这个反对,并且oil industry说这个举动会恶化燃料提供的问题
SV agreement: proposal is subj, so we need use has instead of have
v.+ing modifier vs. which modifier: saying in choice A, showed us proposal is saying, illogical; which in choice C, refers to oil industry, 就近原则
choice a, saying作为句末的结果/伴随状语往前修饰最近的动词has sparked,导致say的主语变成了proposal。语意错误,根据逻辑应该是oil industry发出了这个反对,并且oil industry说这个举动会恶化燃料提供的问题
says的主语是oil industry
因为
这就是which修饰noun+prep的情况,by短语修饰的counterattack,有直接联系,直接修饰,所以which可以直接修饰noun+prep
可是oil industry都可以say,为什么proposal不能
指代的是counterattack吧登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
exacerbate 使···恶化