A study published in the British Medical Journal showed that women who ate nuts more than five times a week were about one third less likely to suffer from coronary heart disease than were those who ate no nuts at all.
than were those who ate
than those who ate
略
略
略
A study published in the British Medical Journal showed | that women (who ate nuts more than five times a week) were about one third less likely to suffer from coronary heart disease than those (who ate no nuts at all) were.
毕老师,是这样理解么?
可以~
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
women +定语 were less likely to suffer than those woman +定语。 老师,这个选项哪里错了?
潇潇说的是对的。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
这道题上课讲过,想起来了…
一周吃五次以上坚果的女人跟她们不吃的时候比
一周吃五次以上的女人和不吃见过的女人比,逻辑上也对呀?
B是一周吃五次的女人和其他的不吃的女人比。样本不一样,因为不能确定是不是只在吃坚果这方面不同。可能还有熬夜抽烟喝酒肥胖这种原因
因为不能确定是不是只在吃坚果这方面不同?这句话什么意思?在suffer from 冠心病上,就是拿吃不吃坚果咋在比啊?
对的,所以样本要选择相同的人吃坚果和不吃的时候比才能确定是因为吃坚果导致的冠心病
谢谢!
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
句子可以理解为是women A were less likely to do C than women B were likely to do C 么?
可以。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
实在不理解为什么多出来一个were?不是人比人么……句子看懂了也做不对:(
不是人比人,是两种人患上病的概率的对比。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
不懂,求解答
这也是一个倒装,比较的是两种情况。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论