In 1923, the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia as unconstitutional, and ruling that it was a form of price fixing and, as such, an abridgment of the right of contract.
the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia as unconstitutional, and
the Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia, and
the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia,
a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court,
when the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia as unconstitutional,
其实我觉得ruling that能看出来是一个伴随状语,那么一定是主语发出的动作,所以DE一下子就能排除,因为无法发出这个动作啊
D选项是否可以依据ruling that it was a form是一个状语从句,一定就近修饰一个谓语动词(或者说就近的句子的主语),那么主语“a minimum wage” 是一个没有生命力的东西,不能发出ruling 这个动作呀?
解析就是这个意思。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论