扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / OG12-CR-65
Excavation of the ancient city of Kourion on the island of Cyprus revealed a pattern of debris and collapsed buildings typical of towns devastated by earthquakes. Archaeologists have hypothesized that the destruction was due to a major earthquake known to have occurred near the island in A.D. 365.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the archaeologists' hypothesis?
Bronze ceremonial drinking vessels that are often found in graves dating from years preceding and following A.D. 365 were also found in several graves near Kourion.
No coins minted after A.D. 365 were found in Kourion, but coins minted before that year were found in abundance.
Most modern histories of Cyprus mention that an earthquake occurred near the island in A.D. 365.
Several small statues carved in styles current in Cyprus in the century between A.D. 300 and A.D. 400 were found in Kourion.
Stone inscriptions in a form of the Greek alphabet that was definitely used in Cyprus after A.D. 365 were found in Kourion.
Q: I mistakenly choose the option c, and I guess the error is probably due to the merely rewrite of the stimulus.
However, the choice b could be demonstrated by the fact that the coins might be just discarded for use after 365, in this way, the option could not precisely buttress the exact time when the earthquake happened.
C不对是因为，这个题的结论不是地震，而是破坏是由地震产生的，CR是削弱或者加强推理逻辑，C只是说有地震，但没有加强推理逻辑。
B说，没发现地震之后的硬币，只发现了地震之前的，加强了地震和摧毁的因果相关。补脑的话是有其他各种可能，除了discard了还可能是考古学家就没找着呢...但CR选的是可以加强、削弱的选项，而不是绝对到能将逻辑链锁死证明推理100%正确。否则的话，以果因推理为例，排除某一个其他原因的选项也没法算加强了，因为排除了一个，还有未知N多可能呢。。。
肥肠感谢！！！
解释不错！
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论