A:
This is 100% grammatically correct. I think the rhetorical emphasis on the subject makes it clear who will do the marrying. Let's say this one is 90% clear.
D:
This is also 100% clear, absolutely no ambiguity imaginable, and we get to keep the queen. This is win-win.
Th is sentence should use the construction x
happened so that y could happen; so introduces a
clause of purpose, explaining the reason for the
action in the main clause. Henry … sought to have
his marriage … annulled so that he could marry Anne
Boleyn. Th e relationship between the two clauses
is clear.
A So as to marry is not idiomatically correct;
it does not identify who will marry.
A:
This is 100% grammatically correct. I think the rhetorical emphasis on the subject makes it clear who will do the marrying. Let's say this one is 90% clear.
D:
This is also 100% clear, absolutely no ambiguity imaginable, and we get to keep the queen. This is win-win.
Th is sentence should use the construction x
happened so that y could happen; so introduces a
clause of purpose, explaining the reason for the
action in the main clause. Henry … sought to have
his marriage … annulled so that he could marry Anne
Boleyn. Th e relationship between the two clauses
is clear.
A So as to marry is not idiomatically correct;
it does not identify who will marry.
Prep2008E1-SC-174也是so as to和so that
so as to...是接的indirect intention,而这句里marry Anne是King sought to have marriage to Queen annulled的direct intention,所以这种情况下应该用so that...会比so as to好
精辟啊~
害羞( ̄▽ ̄)是前辈们总结的好,我只是搬运者
毕老师好辛苦啊~这么晚还没睡
感谢解释!
不客气( ´▽` )ノ
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
老师,是不是E选项里面的would用法不对呢?
那A选项又为什么不对呢?so as to做状语,原则是就近修饰,所以修饰have...annulled。
so as to身后是不定式,so that连接的是从句。其实是考查不定式和从句的区别的。
这样子啊……
那这部分是做状语的,用从句就表示:主句的发生与否不能对这个部分产生影响。可是他废除和QC的婚姻不就是为了娶AB吗?
理论上,离婚这件事其实并不会让结婚这件事发生。通常我们用不定式的时候,是目的状语,例如:
To see you, I went to NY.
这句话中,主句我去纽约的发生,会导致状语中see you这个事件的发生。但是,在本题中,其实离婚并不会导致结婚这个事件的发生。(至于很多同学会把它翻译成“为了结婚,所以离婚”,那其实是我们自己对于题目的猜想,并不是题目真正想表达的意思)
是喔……确实是离婚并不会导致与另一个人结婚的!这样不用不定式就合理了!
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论