Although custom prosthetic bone replacements produced through a new computer-aided design process will cost more than twice as much as ordinary replacements, custom replacements should still be cost-effective. Not only will surgery and recovery time be reduced, but custom replacements should last longer, thereby reducing the need for further hospital stays.
Which of the following must be studied in order to evaluate the argument presented above?
The amount of time a patient spends in surgery versus the amount of time spent recovering from surgery
The amount by which the cost of producing custom replacements has declined with the introduction of the new technique for producing them
The degree to which the use of custom replacements is likely to reduce the need for repeat surgery when compared with the use of ordinary replacements
The degree to which custom replacements produced with the new technique are more carefully manufactured than are ordinary replacements
The amount by which custom replacements produced with the new technique will drop in cost as the production procedures become standardized and applicable on a larger scale
C就像是买台机器
日本人的 价格便宜 质量也不错
德国人的 价格高 质量杠杠的
觉得省钱就买日本的 ...结果被套进去了
的确第一次付钱是节约钱了,可后来才发现原来维护周期短,维护费用超级高
何必当初
因果推理
结论:虽然新技术的钱花了两倍,但是因为手术和复原时间更短,以及replacement时间更长了,所以减少了未来的住院,所以仍然是cost effective的
致命点:注重在是否是原逻辑讲述的原因上,对原逻辑形成直接的削弱或加强的作用(原逻辑包括“cost effective这个结论”,“和住院和恢复时间减少这个原因”,两个方面)
A.迷惑项,这两个东西对比无意义,要和自己本身过去对比
B.迷惑项,的确和钱有关,但不是原来的原因,并且原来的重点在住院时间上(时间!)
C.正确,是否真的减少手术的需要,也就是否会减少住院的需要
D.无关
E.和原原因无关
对啦repeat surgery看似无关,其实用另一个概念高度概括surgery time/recovery time/custom replacement time