Homeowners aged 40 to 50 are more likely to purchase ice cream and are more likely to purchase it in larger amounts than are members of any other demographic group. The popular belief that teenagers eat more ice cream than adults must, therefore, be false.
The argument is flawed primarily because the author
fails to distinguish between purchasing and consuming
does not supply information about homeowners in age groups other than 40 to 50
depends on popular belief rather than on documented research findings
does not specify the precise amount of ice cream purchased by any demographic group
discusses ice cream rather than more nutritious and healthful foods
40-50岁的人买的多,以此来反驳一个结论,指出其中的谬误。买的不代表吃的。B说没有提供其它年龄组的信息,本题的反驳应该是跟这个年龄组有关的。因果类型,1、他因,2、因果无关联。本题A指出因果无关联
词
相关因果吧。
40-50(年龄)的人买冰激凌的多,也就是年龄和冰激凌的事,推导出来年龄与冰激凌的关系:因为他是40-50的人,所以他买的冰激凌最多。取反就是不是40-50的人,买的冰激凌就不是最多的。也就是青少年,买冰激凌不是最多的。但这个题是给的吃冰激凌,题目要去削弱,所以就从CQ:相关性上,吃和买不相关,来削弱。
不知道这么想对不对。。。
样本的一致性,买冰淇淋的人群和吃冰淇淋的人群不是同一个样本
前提:40-50岁的人比其他年龄层的人买更多的冰淇淋
结论:青少年吃更多冰淇淋的观点是错的
削弱:purchase &eat不同,青少年都是40-50岁的爸妈买的?