Retail sales rose 0.8 of 1 percent in August, intensifying expectations that personal spending in the July-September quarter more than doubled that of the 1.4 percent growth rate in personal spending for the previous quarter.
that personal spending in the July-September quarter more than doubled that of
that personal spending in the July-September quarter would more than double
of personal spending in the July-September quarter, that it more than doubled
of personal spending in the July-September quarter more than doubling that of
of personal spending in the July-September quarter, that it would more than double that of
题目分析:
在(A)(B)中,expectation的同位语部分是一个句子,这个句子的核心词是动词double;在(C)(D)(E)中,该同位语部分的核心词为personal spending。其次,我们在题目中还可以发现比较词more than。
选项分析:
A选项:比较对象应该是一个季度的personal spending增长率和另外一个季度的personal spending的增长率。由于划线部分身后已经写出了in personal spending,所以double身后不需要that of来指代personal spending。另外,double在本选项中是过去时,应改为would double,因为整个划线部分均是expectation的内容。
B选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
C选项:Intensifying expectations身后的定语是一个of型所有格。这个部分的核心词是personal spending。但在逻辑上,预期(expectation)的内容应该是在7~9月份的个人消费会怎么样,而不是个人消费本身。
D选项:of型所有格部分的核心词错误同(C)。
E选项:of型所有格部分的核心词错误同(C);比较对象错误同(A)。
B. correct; Would在这里表示expectation的内容没有实现。
C. 整个句式awkward, that为同位语从句引导词与of平行共同修饰expectations, 其实没有必要先说一遍
topic再接着详述,像B一样直接详述即可; doubled时态错误
D. Of短语无法明确表明expectations的核心内容,应该用同位语从句
E. 句式awkward错误同C
Retail sales rose 0.8 of 1 percent in August, intensifying expectations that personal spending in the July-September quarter 【would more than double】 the 1.4 percent growth rate in personal spending for the previous quarter.
8 月份零售额增长 0.8%,增幅为 1%,强化了对 7 月至 9 月当季个人支出将比上一季度 1.4% 的增长率增加一倍以上的预期。
2.句意推理,是expections of 还是expection that,前者的意思是某物的期望,后者意思是,期望一件事。
根据后面的句意我们可以推出,是拿这个数据和去年的数据对比,翻了一倍。
单说intensifying expections of personal spending,增强了个人消费的期望,这个意思的重点倾向于今年的个人消费,而不是两者的对比。
因此用that更好,CDE错
C选项:Intensifying expectations身后的定语是一个of型所有格。这个部分的核心词是personal spending。但在逻辑上,预期(expectation)的内容应该是在7~9月份的个人消费会怎么样,而不是个人消费本身。
ACD就没有了
that personal spending in the July-September quarter would more than double the 1.4 percent growth rate in personal spending for the previous quarter.
e中that of没有核心词,多余
定语:描述名词特征;
同位语从句:如果先行词在从句中不充当任何成分,称为同位语从句,和主句有同等地位;
AB:同位语从句;
CDE:所有格形式作定语
在从句中突出的是Verb (doubling),在所有格形式中突出的是Noun(personal spending),而期待的应该是发生某个动作/某个事件,而不是人本身(就好比我期待吴亦凡给我买包包,但我不期待吴亦凡这个人);
较之AB,A的 that = personal spending of the 1.4 growth rate in personal spending,非常冗余,注意还原;
再之,expect应该是表示期待未来发生某事,因此B
it seems we are all confused the shit out of ourselves by B...
总觉得这里很别扭。。。personal spending double the growth rate,总额是增长额的两倍多??
expectation expect等最好加上would / will 表示将来的动作
怎么明显错误了?
AB: 同位语从句 PK CDE:同位语短语,所有格形式在从句中突出的是Verb (doubling),在所有格形式中突出的是Noun(personal spending),而期待的应该是发生某个动作/某个事件,而不是人本身(就好比我期待吴亦凡给我买包包,但我不期待吴亦凡这个人);
较之AB,A的 that = personal spending of the 1.4 growth rate in personal spending,非常冗余,注意还原;
再之,expect应该是表示期待未来发生某事,因此B
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
C选项:it指代personal spending, 重复
D选项:不优
E选项:同C