Scientists typically do their most creative work before the age of forty. It is commonly thought that this happens because aging by itself brings about a loss of creative capacity. However, studies show that of scientists who produce highly creative work beyond the age of forty, a disproportionately large number entered their field at an older age than is usual. Since by the age of forty the large majority of scientists have been working in their field for at least fifteen years, the studies' finding strongly suggests that the real reason why scientists over forty rarely produce highly creative work is not that they have aged but rather that scientists over forty have generally spent too long in their field.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is at issue in the argument; the second is a conclusion drawn on the basis of that claim.
The first is an objection that has been raised against a position defended in the argument; the second is that position.
The first is evidence that has been used to support an explanation that the argument challenges; the second is that explanation.
The first is evidence that has been used to support an explanation that the argument challenges; the second is a competing explanation that the argument favors.
The first provides evidence to support an explanation that the argument favors; the second is that explanation.
情景:科学家创造性工作都在40岁之前。普遍认为,年龄增长会导致创造力下降。然而,研究表明40岁后做出创造性工作的科学家,平均入行年龄偏高。因为到了40岁,多数科学家都已从事该领域15年以上了,研究结果显示40岁以上的科学家没创造力不是因为年龄大,而是因为他们从事该领域的时间太长。
推理:第一个黑体字是前提句,第二个黑体字是结论句。
选题方式:略
选项分析:
A选项: 第一个黑体字是一个声称,其准确性在论证中受到争议;第二个黑体字是是基于第一个黑体字得出的结论。第一个黑体字的准确性在推理文段中没有被质疑。
B选项:第一个黑体字是一个反驳了主结论所维护的立场的反驳;第二个黑体字是那个立场。第一个黑体字是前提,没有反驳任何句子。
C选项:第一个黑体字是支持了主结论所反对的解释的证据;第二个黑体字是那个立场。第一个黑体字是前提,直接支持了结论。
D选项:第一个黑体字是支持了主结论所反对的解释的证据;第二个黑体字是论证赞成的一个解释。第一个黑体字是前提,直接支持了结论。
E选项:Correct. 第一个黑体字提供了支持主结论赞成的解释的证据;第二个黑体字是那个解释。
事实:科学家做有创作性的工作都是在40岁之前
解释:因为岁数大,创作能力下降(作者不认同)
转折:40岁后做出创造性工作的科学家,平均入行年龄偏高
为作者支持的观点做解释:不是因为岁数大没发现,而是因为工作了太长时间没了创造性
argument结论,即为第二个黑体部分。的哥黑体部分是支持结论的前提。
注意:主结论赞成的立场。
基于全文内容,文中论证argument 赞成的是scientists over forty have generally spent too long in their field.
b: against a position defended in the argument, 论证没有维护文中第一句话。 注意逐字阅读。
c,d : argument没有challenge 第一个黑体字
e: The first provides evidence to support an explanation that the argument favors, 论证确实赞成了第一个黑体字,并在第二个黑体字做了说明解释。
however引出的论据和前面的推论解释相反,然后前面的推论解释又和文末的推论解释相反,所以however句(即第一个黑脸句)支持文末的黑脸句。而文末即是全文的argument,黑脸句是favor argument的。
我觉得文章二句,首句是描述事实: scientists typically do their most creative work before the age of forty.
然后第二句是对其解释,指出普遍看法,所以我觉得这是conclusion:It is commonly thought that this happens because aging by itself brings about a loss of creative capacity.
第三句也就是第一句黑体字前面由however引出,表明是对前面立场的反驳,也就是反驳上句所列出的解释explaination.
但是,这句由studies show that...引出,为事实,不能做立场,所以是论据,支持谁呢?也就是找出一个和第二句相对的对于一句的解释的句子,这时候便找到了第二句黑体字
第一句黑脸句子其实是evidence,是相对客观的,而不是claim(相对主观)的。
你这个逻辑实用靠谱
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
Challenge/Favor表明立场差别。
我觉得这道题唯一的难点就是C和E,第一次做一看however就判定后文是相反关系,但是仔细看选项会发现that...challenge/favors是修饰explanation的,而explanation是和argument的方向一致的,所以只能是favors
为什么不是D。。。。。
D很明显提到的两个方向是相反的(challenges/favors),而第二句however之后的内容大方向都应该是一致的,所以违背了原文
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
第二段加黑是主结论;
A-The first is a claim (Claim只表示宣称,本身没有倾向) the accuracy of which is at issue in the argument;(没有提到准确性的问题,错),the second is a conclusion drawn on the basis of that claim. (对);排除A
B-Objection(错,题干是研究表明,不是主观的判断,排除B)
C-The first is evidence that has been used to support an explanation(至此对,确实是个证据) that the argument challenges(说前面的证据是对主结论的反对,错,这个证据是倒向/支持主结论的); the second is that explanation.
D-同C,排除
E-the argument favors(前面的证据是对主结论的支持)
E选项里,毕老师解释”第一个黑体字提供了支持主结论赞成的解释的证据”, 为什么我死活觉得是主结论反对的解释的证据呢?因为这个观点最后被推翻了呀?
E选项里,毕老师解释”第一个黑体字提供了支持主结论赞成的解释的证据”, 为什么我死活觉得是主结论反对的解释的证据呢?因为这个观点最后被推翻了呀?
怎么知道答案选项中指的the argument 到底是哪个argument呢?? 做错是因为觉得选项中的 “the argument”指的是题干第一句第二句所以全部选反了。但是题里也没说到底the argument 指的是前面的commonly though 还是 后面的 the studies' finding 啊。。。
先要找到argument的中心思想,也就是最后一句。
和最后一句相对的,就是the argument challenges
和最后一句相同的,就是the argument favors
再结合第一句是客观现实,第二句是主观观点就做完了
explanation 可以理解为 conclusion 吗?
A选项中前半句的描述,是不是更好的对应了第一个黑脸句子的前面一句?this happens because aging by itself brings about a loss of...
第一句黑脸句子其实是evidence,是相对客观的,而不是claim(相对主观)的。
感觉每一个选项的翻译都不是很到位,读起来很拗口,还是需要返回去看选项原文
对啦