扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / OG2016-CR-50
Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern, non-forager societies.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists' strategy?
All forager societies throughout history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other types of societies.
Most ancient forager societies either dissolved or made a transition to another way of life.
All anthropologists study one kind or another of modern-day society.
Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies.
Even those modern-day forager societies that have not had significant contact with modern societies are importantly different from ancient forager societies.
从C,P上来看我觉得更像是因果。虽然选项的确很像类比，只是题干的信息我实在没法提炼出来类比，没有说任何古代和现代的相似性。
P：不能用现代掠夺者社会去了解古代掠夺者社会（现代掠夺者社会已经极度变化了）
C：因为任何掠夺者社会都和现代非掠夺者社会极度接触（没有参考意义）
A正确 找出掠夺者社会和现代非掠夺者社会的区别
B加强
C D无关项
E加强
从C,P上来看我觉得更像是因果。虽然选项的确很像类比，只是题干的信息我实在没法提炼出来类比，没有说任何古代和现代的相似性
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
又是一道题干都读不懂的题
比较两个东西，人类学家可行，别人批判不可行，理由是这两个东西不相似，批判这个观点。那么就是这两个东西相似咯…
我觉得这更像是一个类比推理，前提说人类学家研究现代forager社会的特征，隐含的结论是由此可以推断出古代forager社会的特征。文段在后面自己批判了这个推理，指出了“相似性问题”：人类学家研究的forager社会和非forager社会间存在交集，而古代forager社会没有。题目问如何削弱这个批判，所以正确答案应为“现代和古代的forager社会存在相似性”。
同意！
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
这是一个方案推理。结论提出了方案的不可行性。题目是要反驳这个结论。直接对结论削弱就可以
感觉是类比？现代社会和古代社会
方案通常都是为了解决一个问题，提出一个方案作为解决办法
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
好奇怪的题目啊。。。我连因果都不清楚，哭。