While the most abundant and dominant species within a particular ecosystem is often crucial in perpetuating the ecosystem, a "keystone" species, here defined as one whose effects are much larger than would be predicted from its abundance, can also play a vital role. But because complex species interactions may be involved, identifying a keystone species by removing the species and observing changes in the ecosystem is problematic. It might seem that certain traits would clearly define a species as a keystone species; for example, Pisaster ochraceus is often a keystone predator because it consumes and suppresses mussel populations, which in the absence of this starfish can be a dominant species. But such predation on a dominant or potentially dominant species occurs in systems that do as well as in systems that do not have species that play keystone roles. Moreover, whereas P. ochraceus occupies an unambiguous keystone role on wave-exposed rocky headlands, in more wave-sheltered habitats the impact of P. ochraceus predation is weak or nonexistent, and at certain sites sand burial is responsible for eliminating mussels. Keystone status appears to depend on context, whether of particular geography or of such factors as community diversity (for example, a reduction in species diversity may thrust more of the remaining species into keystone roles) and length of species interaction (since newly arrived species in particular may dramatically affect ecosystems).
Which of the following hypothetical experiments most clearly exemplifies the method of identifying species' roles that the author considers problematic?
A population of seals in an Arctic habitat is counted in order to determine whether it is the dominant species in that ecosystem.
A species of fish that is a keystone species in one marine ecosystem is introduced into another marine ecosystem to see whether the species will come to occupy a keystone role.
In order to determine whether a species of monkey is a keystone species within a particular ecosystem, the monkeys are removed from that ecosystem and the ecosystem is then studied.
Different mountain ecosystems are compared to determine how geography affects a particular species' ability to dominate its ecosystem.
In a grassland experiencing a changing climate, patterns of species extinction are traced in order to evaluate the effect of climate changes on keystone species in that grassland.
题目分析:
文章推断题:以下哪个实验是作者认为有问题的那个辨别keystone的方法?
原文提到的“有问题的实验”:因为物种间有相互作用,通过“移除物种并观察生态系统的变化”的方法是有问题的。
选项分析:
A选项:为了弄清海豹是不是所在生态系统的主导物种,数一下北极的海豹:原文没有提到“统计数量”这个方法。
B选项:把某个海洋系统的鱼引入到另一个生态系统中,来看看它能否再次成为keystone:原文没有提到“把keystone移来移去”。
C选项:正确。为了弄清某种猴子是不是keystone,这种猴子被移除并且其所在的生态系统被研究:与原文描述一致。
D选项:对比不同的山地生态系统,为了研究地理学如何影响某个物种主导生态系统的能力:原文没提。
E选项:在一个气候变化多端的草原,物种灭绝的规律被追溯,为了评估气候变化对keystone的影响:没有提到trace pattern这个方法。
定位 identifying a keystone species by removing the species and observing changes in the ecosystem is problematic.
rc
简单题
exemplify例证
理解错题意了the author considers problematic?
就是关于removing的部分,author觉得problematic
exemplify例证
But because complex species interactions may be involved, identifying a keystone species by removing the species and observing changes in the ecosystem is problematic.
problematic!!!
更正:作者认为 “统治地位是取决于物种消失以后对环境的影响” 是错误的
定位句:a "keystone" species, here defined as one whose effects are much larger than would be predicted from its abundance
统治地位是取决于物种消失以后对环境的影响,只有C提到了物种消失,”are removed“
类别题:根据题目定位到文章的第二段,做类比题一定要在原句中提取可类比的要素,如原文“identifying a keystone species by removing the species and observing changes in the ecosystem is problematic”,将removing和observing两个要素与选项进行对比,可以得到C为正确答案。