扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / OG2015-SC-82
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients' misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.
in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy,
if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food,
in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food,
if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior,
in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior,
还没有题目讲解（毕出老师会陆续发布对官方考题的解读，请保持关注）。
辩护律师偶尔会辩称，他们的客户的不当行为源于对某些东西的反应，但在将犯罪或不良行为归咎于某些食物过敏时，行凶者实际上被告知，他们对自己的行为不负责任。
in attributing，看到这个动词性伴随说明的话，就要找这个动作的发起者，perpetrators，行凶者作恶者，不是attribute的主语，与前文一致，clients` misconduct是主语，人的行为，而不是人做动词发起者。
some food allergy 中，some指代有歧义 可以修饰food 也可修饰allergy。所以an allergy to some food 更好。
默认in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy（把犯罪事实归因于食物过敏）的动作发出者是the perpetrators（犯罪分子），可是这事是Defense attorneys归因的，所以主语错误；所以排除(in) attributing...to开头的所有选项。
A SVO,but in doing,SVO
A选项，默认in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy（把犯罪事实归因于食物过敏）的动作发出者是the perpetrators（犯罪分子），可是这事是Defense attorneys归因的，所以主语错误；所以排除(in) attributing...to开头的所有选项，ACE排除，DE in attribute to 搭配不了as. 有主动遍不使用被动
求讲解
A C E里面in attributing修饰的是the perpetrators，但是实际动作的发出者是Defense attorneys。
D E里面attributed 和cause重复
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论