To evaluate a plan to save money on office-space expenditures by having its employees work at home, XYZ Company asked volunteers from its staff to try the arrangement for six months. During this period, the productivity of these employees was as high as or higher than before.
Which of the following, if true, would argue most strongly against deciding, on the basis of the trial results, to implement the company's plan?
The employees who agreed to participate in the test of the plan were among the company's most self-motivated and independent workers.
The savings that would accrue from reduced office-space expenditures alone would be sufficient to justify the arrangement for the company, apart from any productivity increase.
Other companies that have achieved successful results from work-at-home plans have work forces that are substantially larger than that of XYZ.
The volunteers who worked at home were able to communicate with other employees as necessary for performing the work.
Minor changes in the way office work is organized at XYZ would yield increases in employee productivity similar to those achieved in the trial.
枚举推理
志愿者们在家工作---效率提高了
所以让整个公司员工都这样---效率也能提高
削弱,样本代表性或提出平行样本
A 这些志愿者是自制能力最强的。。所以样本没有代表性
B 没有谈到样本
C 没有谈到样本
D 志愿者可以去其他的员工交流。 这和推理文段无关
E 谈论是在家工作提高效率问题,这个选项说能否改变工作环境提高工作效率,无关
统计推断,CQ1样本代表性
所选取的样本并不具有代表性?是这样吗