There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian populations and of extinctions of a number of the world's endangered amphibian species. These declines, if real, may be signs of a general trend toward extinction, and many environmentalists have claimed that immediate environmental action is necessary to remedy this "amphibian crisis," which, in their view, is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity.
To evaluate these claims, it is useful to make a preliminary distinction that is far too often ignored. A declining population should not be confused with an endangered one. An endangered population is always rare, almost always small, and, by definition, under constant threat of extinction even without a proximate cause in human activities. Its disappearance, however unfortunate, should come as no great surprise. Moreover, chance events—which may indicate nothing about the direction of trends in population size—may lead to its extinction. The probability of extinction due to such random factors depends on the population size and is independent of the prevailing direction of change in that size.
For biologists, population declines are potentially more worrisome than extinctions. Persistent declines, especially in large populations, indicate a changed ecological context. Even here, distinctions must again be made among declines that are only apparent (in the sense that they are part of habitual cycles or of normal fluctuations), declines that take a population to some lower but still acceptable level, and those that threaten extinction (e.g., by taking the number of individuals below the minimum viable population). Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.
It is indisputably true that there is simply not enough long-term scientific data on amphibian populations to enable researchers to identify real declines in amphibian populations. Many fairly common amphibian species declared all but extinct after severe declines in the 1950s and 1960s have subsequently recovered, and so might the apparently declining populations that have generated the current appearance of an amphibian crisis. Unfortunately, longterm data will not soon be forthcoming, and postponing environmental action while we wait for it may doom species and whole ecosystems to extinction.
Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in the highlighted text?
To give an example of a particular kind of study
To cast doubt on an assertion made in the previous sentence
To raise an objection to a view presented in the first paragraph
To provide support for a view presented in the first paragraph
To introduce an idea that will be countered in the following paragraph
题目分析:
文章推断题:高亮的句子的作用是?
原文这句话说明,我们无法辨别两栖动物数量下降是属于哪种情况,况且数量之前一直在波动。
选项分析:
A选项:是某个研究的例子:文章没有提到某个研究。
B选项:质疑前一句的论点:前一句和这一句的态度是一样的,没有质疑态度。
C选项:正确。反对第一段的观点:第一段认为数量下降预示着一个危机,而后文说到数量下降的原因有很多,所以质疑了第一段的观点。
D选项:支持第一段的观点:错误。
E选项:介绍一个下一段会被反驳的观点:下一段说到 之前下降的数量又回升了,所以是支持这句话的。
B. previous sentence指的是前一句话,应该是previous paragraph
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论