A small number of the forest species of lepidoptera (moths and butterflies, which exist as caterpillars during most of their life cycle) exhibit regularly recurring patterns of population growth and decline—such fluctuations in population are known as population cycles. Although many different variables influence population levels, a regular pattern such as a population cycle seems to imply a dominant, driving force. Identification of that driving force, however, has proved surprisingly elusive despite considerable research. The common approach of studying causes of population cycles by measuring the mortality caused by different agents, such as predatory birds or parasites, has been unproductive in the case of lepidoptera. Moreover, population ecologists' attempts to alter cycles by changing the caterpillars' habitat and by reducing caterpillar populations have not succeeded. In short, the evidence implies that these insect populations, if not self-regulating, may at least be regulated by an agent more intimately connected with the insect than are predatory birds or parasites.
Recent work suggests that this agent may be a virus. For many years, viral disease had been reported in declining populations of caterpillars, but population ecologists had usually considered viral disease to have contributed to the decline once it was underway rather than to have initiated it. The recent work has been made possible by new techniques of molecular biology that allow viral DNA to be detected at low concentrations in the environment. Nuclear polyhedrosis viruses are hypothesized to be the driving force behind population cycles in lepidoptera in part because the viruses themselves follow an infectious cycle in which, if protected from direct sunlight, they may remain virulent for many years in the environment, embedded in durable crystals of polyhedrin protein. Once ingested by a caterpillar, the crystals dissolve, releasing the virus to infect the insect's cells. Late in the course of the infection, millions of new virus particles are formed and enclosed in polyhedrin crystals. These crystals reenter the environment after the insect dies and decomposes, thus becoming available to infect other caterpillars.
One of the attractions of this hypothesis is its broad applicability. Remarkably, despite significant differences in habitat and behavior, many species of lepidoptera have population cycles of similar length, between eight and 11 years. Nuclear polyhedrosis viral infection is one factor these disparate species share.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author's conclusion in the highlighted text?
New research reveals that the number of species of birds and parasites that prey on lepidoptera has dropped significantly in recent years.
New experiments in which the habitats of lepidoptera are altered in previously untried ways result in the shortening of lepidoptera population cycles.
Recent experiments have revealed that the nuclear polyhedrosis virus is present in a number of predators and parasites of lepidoptera.
Differences among the habitats of lepidoptera species make it difficult to assess the effects of weather on lepidoptera population cycles.
Viral disease is typically observed in a large proportion of the lepidoptera population.
题目分析:
文章推断题:以下哪个可以削弱作者在line 18-22的结论?
原文:总而言之,这些证据表明,如果不是自我调节,一定有个和昆虫更亲密的东西在调节
这个结论的证据是:“鸟和寄生虫”的办法不适用;通过改变栖息地和减少毛毛虫数量的办法也失败了。
本题逻辑链:因为X不是原因,Y不是原因,所以猜测是Z是原因。正确选项:现在新发现X可以是原因,削弱原结论。
选项分析:
A选项:新研究表明,吃L的鸟和寄生虫的数量这几年明显下降:他们的数量对办法有没有用并没有影响,即使数量减少也不能改变“不适用”这个结果。
B选项:正确。新实验(用新办法改变栖息地)成功缩短了L的population cycle:说明之前的办法不全面,现在有了新办法且成功了,说明driving force很有可能并不是另一个agent。
C选项:最近的实验发现病毒在L的捕食者和寄生虫里:说明病毒和population cycle的关联度更高了,加强了结论。
D选项:L物种的栖息地不同,导致很难估计天气的影响:天气的影响难以估计≠天气对栖息地有影响,从而进一步对population cycle有影响。
E选项:很大一部分的L有病毒存在:病毒存在越多,越可以加强结论。
研究者发现:1想要探寻改变life circle的因素(这是研究的目的,要搞清楚); 2)通过改变habitats,或者减少了毛毛虫的数量的办法 change life cycle; 两者都没有成功(排除法)
conclusion:这些虫子如果不是自我调节,就一定有个和昆虫更亲密的东西在调节life circle
A选项:新研究表明,吃L的鸟和寄生虫的数量这几年明显下降:他们的数量对办法有没有用并没有影响,即使数量减少也不能改变“不适用”这个结果。(顶多说明鸟和寄生虫的影响有限,无法削弱结论!)
B选项:正确。新实验(用新办法改变栖息地)成功缩短了L的population cycle:说明之前的办法不全面,现在有了新办法且成功了,说明driving force很有可能并不是另一个agent。(新方式改变栖息地是为它因!)
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论