Laos has a land area about the same as Great Britain but only four million in population, where many are members of hill tribes ensconced in the virtually inaccessible mountain valleys of the north.
about the same as Great Britain but only four million in population, where many
of about the same size as Great Britain is, but in Laos there is a population of only four million, and many
that is about the same size as Great Britain's land area, but in Laos with a population of only four million people, many of them
comparable to the size of Great Britain, but only four million in population, and many
comparable to that of Great Britain but a population of only four million people, many of whom
题目分析:
略
选项分析:
A选项:比较对象不正确,应该比较的是英国的面积而不是英国本身,即,应改为:
Laos has a land area about the same as that of Great Britain.
另外,population不应该用where修饰。where引导的定语从句只能修饰地点名词。
B选项:本选项中Laos是there is a population of only four million的地点状语。其描述的是“在老挝里,这仅有400w人口”,这是不合逻辑的,例如:
(1) 在中国,这有一辆车。(In China, there is a car.)
(2) 中国有一辆车。(China has a car)
两个例句的意思是完全不同的。句(1)中,我们无法确定这辆车是否属于中国所有,例如这辆车的主人是个美国人,他把车放在了中国境内,但你不能说,这辆车就是中国的。用之于本题,显然地,一定是“老挝自己仅仅拥有400w人口”。
另外,“老挝有多少人口”和“这些人口的分布情况”不应该是并且(and)关系,而应该是主次关系。因为,人口分布情况是在介绍老挝人口情况的。(依图形背景原则)
C选项:Laos不是拥有population of only four million的主语错误同(B)。
D选项:“老挝有多少人口”和“这些人口的分布情况”并列错误同(B)。
E选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
按照图形背景原则,应该是更大范围的作为从句,那么应该就是老挝整体人口作为从句才对,为什么答案中是人口分布情况为从句呢?
时间轴上持续更长的应该是人口分布情况吧,毕竟中国没几年就从12亿蹦到了13亿,但是人口分布状况几乎就还是那个样子吧
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论