A new study suggests that the conversational pace of everyday life may be so brisk it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make sense of speech.
it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make
that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and, as a result, to make
that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and, the result of this, they are unable to make
that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words, and results in not making
as to hamper the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words, resulting in being unable to make
题目分析:
本题中我们能看到一个平行制造者and,其连接的两者需要在逻辑上和语形上保持一致。
选项分析:
A选项:“区分声音和单词(distinguish discrete sounds and words)”和“展开讲话(make sense of speech)”应该均是小孩子没有能力做的事情,所以两者需要在语法上保持一致。另外,介词短语for distinguishing discrete sounds and words需改为不定式短语to distinguish discrete sounds and words。这点考查了不定式和ing的区别。用之于本题,主句“阻止小孩在某方面的能力”必然会直接影响“小孩分辨声音”这件事的发生与否,因此需要用不定式做ability的定语。
B选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
C选项:“区分声音和单词(distinguish discrete sounds and words)”和“展开讲话(make sense of speech)”的平行错误同(A)。
D选项:“区分声音和单词(distinguish discrete sounds and words)”和“展开讲话(make sense of speech)”的平行错误同(A)。
E选项:resulting in being unable to make是伴随状语,其主语应该是some children,但是,在逻辑上,某些小孩不能发出result这个动作。介词短语for distinguishing discrete sounds and words需改为不定式短语to distinguish discrete sounds and words错误同选项(A)。
老师,总结了很多题目以后,发现一个问题,就是关于and并列的问题~
原则上讲,and只要并列成分相同的2个部分(即功能平行),不需要严格要求语形和语义上都是平行的。但是看到你在这个题目中,甚至还有一些其他的题目中的解析,又说and需要前后两者语形、语义完全平行,所以我现在有点搞不清楚了,到底and的平行应该是怎么样的?还是“跟着感觉走”?看题目的情况?但是,这样貌似有点不靠谱吧......
豆号+and这种情况,前后连接两个完整的句子(都有主语和谓语),如果是并列的话,要看功能,比如并列动词词组,verb phrase,只要求动词时态和单复数一致就可以,动词后面修饰语可以不同,比如前一个动词由介词短语修饰,后一个动词用副词修饰,都没有问题。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论