A new study suggests that the conversational pace of everyday life may be so brisk it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make sense of speech.
it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make
that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and, as a result, to make
that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and, the result of this, they are unable to make
that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words, and results in not making
as to hamper the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words, resulting in being unable to make
题目分析:
本题中我们能看到一个平行制造者and,其连接的两者需要在逻辑上和语形上保持一致。
选项分析:
A选项:“区分声音和单词(distinguish discrete sounds and words)”和“展开讲话(make sense of speech)”应该均是小孩子没有能力做的事情,所以两者需要在语法上保持一致。另外,介词短语for distinguishing discrete sounds and words需改为不定式短语to distinguish discrete sounds and words。这点考查了不定式和ing的区别。用之于本题,主句“阻止小孩在某方面的能力”必然会直接影响“小孩分辨声音”这件事的发生与否,因此需要用不定式做ability的定语。
B选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
C选项:“区分声音和单词(distinguish discrete sounds and words)”和“展开讲话(make sense of speech)”的平行错误同(A)。
D选项:“区分声音和单词(distinguish discrete sounds and words)”和“展开讲话(make sense of speech)”的平行错误同(A)。
E选项:resulting in being unable to make是伴随状语,其主语应该是some children,但是,在逻辑上,某些小孩不能发出result这个动作。介词短语for distinguishing discrete sounds and words需改为不定式短语to distinguish discrete sounds and words错误同选项(A)。
不定式表示的是一种“主观性”,即,表达一种状态的转换(start-stop)。
ing表示的是一种“客观性”,即,表达一种状态的稳定(process)。
1. 若发生不定式和ing转换的是主语或者表语,则判断标准细化为:不定式表示说话者(当变化部分是主语时)或主语(当变化部分是表语时)能控制其发生与否的事件;ing表示说话者或主语无法控制其发生与否的事件
2. 若发生不定式和ing转换的是宾语或者宾语的补足语,则判断标准细化为:由变化成分的主句的谓语动词的控制力决定。所谓控制力,也叫约束力,指的是通过谓语动词是否能控制"谓宾动词"所表示的事件的出现与否。原因是:谓宾动词受施事的控制力越强,则谓宾作为独立事件的独立性越小,名物化程度也越高。
3. 若发生不定式和ing转换的是状语或者定语,则判断标准细化为:变化成分的主句的发生是否对变化成分的发生与否有直接影响。若有,则选不定式,若没有,则选ing
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论