Which of the following, if true, most logically completes the argument?
Some dairy farmers in the province of Takandia want to give their cows a synthetic hormone that increases milk production. Many Takandians, however,do not want to buy milk from cows given the synthetic hormone. For this reason Takandia's legislature is considering a measure requiring milk from cows given the hormone to be labeled as such. Even if the measure is defeated, dairy farmers who use the hormone will probably lose customers, since __________.
it has not been proven that any trace of the synthetic hormone exists in the milk of cows given the hormone
some farmers in Takandia who plan to use the synthetic hormone will probably not do so if the measure were passed
milk from cows that have not been given the synthetic hormone can be labeled as such without any legislative action
the legislature's consideration of the bill has been widely publicized
milk that comes from cows given the synthetic hormone looks and tastes the same as milk from cows that have not received the hormone
CR真的理解清题目的意思很重要呀
仔细看了看,对于be defeated 没有理解,题目的意思原来是贴标签的法案没有实施,但是喂了合成的饲料的牛奶销售不好,问原因,是个加强,C中即使没有法案,正常的牛奶贴了标签就很容易区别,当然那些牛奶销售不了
因果推理
因为政府允许注射荷尔蒙的牛奶不贴上专用标签
所以使用荷尔蒙的农民不会流失很多顾客 削弱结论---即会流失
A 加强了,因为traces发现证明不了和普通的区别
B some无代表性
C 没有使用荷尔蒙的农民可以给他们的牛奶贴上标签。这就导致两种牛奶有区别了,顾客自然会选择有标签的牛奶--削弱结论
D 众所周知,无关
E 说明没区别 加强文段
这是一道Justify conclusion题,要找支持结论的premise。 文中的特殊牛奶,因为法案要求贴标签,客户可以识别出来,而面临销量下降的风险。结论却说,即使没有这条法令,销量也会下降。最有可能的原因还是客户可以识别出这种牛奶,选项C给了解释,特殊牛奶虽然不用贴标签了,但是普通牛奶缺可以贴标签让自己和特殊牛奶区分开来,故正确。
我竟然翻译成了没有激素的贴上了又激素的标签,真是醉。。。
我也是这么理解的...所以我一度在想为什么要这么作非得把自己的好牛奶贴上添加了荷尔蒙的不好的牛奶……
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
c的意思没翻译出来,其实是没有激素的牛贴上了没有激素的标签。