In 1994, a team of scientists led by David Mckay began studying the meteorite ALH84001, which had beendiscovered in Antarctica in 1984. Two years later, the McKay team announced that ALH84001, which scientists generally agree originated on Mars, contained compelling evidence that life once existed on Mars. This evidence includes the discovery of organic molecules in ALH84001, the first ever found in Martian rock. Organic molecules—complex, carbon-based compounds—form the basis for terrestrial life. The organic molecules found in ALH84001 are polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAH's. When microbes die, their organic material often decays into PAH's.
Skepticism about the McKay team's claim remains, however. For example, ALH84001 has been on earth for 13,000 years, suggesting to some scientists that its PAH's might have resulted from terrestrial contamination. However, McKay's team has demonstrated that the concentration of PAH's increases as one looks deeper into ALH84001, contrary to what one would expect from terrestrial contamination. The skeptic's strongest argument, however, is that processes unrelated to organic life can easily produce all the evidence found by McKay' steam, including PAH's. For example, star formation produces PAH's. Moreover, PAH's frequently appear in other meteorites, and no one attributes their presence to life processes. Yet McKay's team notes that the particular combination of PAH's in ALH84001 is more similar to the combinations produced by decaying organisms than to those originating form nonbiological processes.
The primary purpose of the passage is to
describe new ways of studying the possibility that life once existed on Mars
revise a theory regarding the existence of life on Mars in light of new evidence
reconcile conflicting viewpoints regarding the possibility that life once existed on Mars
evaluate a recently proposed argument concerning the origin of ALH84001
describe a controversy concerning the significance of evidence from ALH84001
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是E. 描述ALH84001证据的重要性的争议。因为文章提到,一些科学家质疑大卫·麦凯尔的团队的说法,即ALH84001中的有机分子表明在火星曾经存在过生命过程,质疑者们最强烈的论据是,不相关于有机生命的过程能够生成所有麦凯尔团队发现的证据,包括PAHs。因此,文章的主要目的是描述ALH84001证据的重要性的争议。
错选了reconcile项;后半句对的,但是reconcile的话应该包括作者的个人观点,即两个理论都有优点;但本文是属于驳论文
a controversy concerning the significance of evidence from ALH84001:significance——究竟是否意味着暗示火星生命的存在
D is trap.
Evaluate (Yes)
Propose Argument ( Life ) (Yes)
Origin of ALH84001 (NO!!!!!!)
"which scientists generally agree originated on Mars"
做不对是因为没有理解这里significance的意义:就是说的这些evidence能不能证明火星上有生命
还有就是没理解reconcile的意思:reconcile最重点是在让两个controversial的观点边界模糊
这里就是在提出质疑,而且这个质疑不是针对结论的,是针对证据的
就看C其实不能概括文章,因为文章最重要的东西就是ALH84001这个东西
可以通过选项主旨来推断原文文章,看看是否符合
第二段 怀疑两个字写的那么清楚。。。