In 1994, a team of scientists led by David Mckay began studying the meteorite ALH84001, which had beendiscovered in Antarctica in 1984. Two years later, the McKay team announced that ALH84001, which scientists generally agree originated on Mars, contained compelling evidence that life once existed on Mars. This evidence includes the discovery of organic molecules in ALH84001, the first ever found in Martian rock. Organic molecules—complex, carbon-based compounds—form the basis for terrestrial life. The organic molecules found in ALH84001 are polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAH's. When microbes die, their organic material often decays into PAH's.
Skepticism about the McKay team's claim remains, however. For example, ALH84001 has been on earth for 13,000 years, suggesting to some scientists that its PAH's might have resulted from terrestrial contamination. However, McKay's team has demonstrated that the concentration of PAH's increases as one looks deeper into ALH84001, contrary to what one would expect from terrestrial contamination. The skeptic's strongest argument, however, is that processes unrelated to organic life can easily produce all the evidence found by McKay' steam, including PAH's. For example, star formation produces PAH's. Moreover, PAH's frequently appear in other meteorites, and no one attributes their presence to life processes. Yet McKay's team notes that the particular combination of PAH's in ALH84001 is more similar to the combinations produced by decaying organisms than to those originating form nonbiological processes.
The passage suggests that the fact that ALH84001 has been on earth for 13,000 years has been used by some scientists to support which of the following claims about ALH84001?
ALH84001 may not have originated on Mars.
ALH84001 contains PAH's that are the result of nonbiological processes.
ALH84001 may not have contained PAH's when it landed on Earth.
The organic molecules found in ALH84001 are not PAH's.
The organic molecules found in ALH84001 could not be the result of terrestrial contamination.
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是:E. The organic molecules found in ALH84001 could not be the result of terrestrial contamination。
因为文章指出,ALH84001已经在地球上停留了13000年,这提醒有些科学家认为其中的PAH可能是由地球上的污染物产生的。但是McKay小组证明,PAHs的浓度随着更深入ALH84001的观察而增加,这与地球污染物产生的预期效果相反。所以,此处推断出,ALH84001中发现的有机分子不可能是由地球污染物产生的,所以选项E正确。
在BC里面选择,最后错选了B;当时简单的讲题目定义为原文的同意改写,觉得对比原文(suggesting to some scientists that its PAH's might have resulted from terrestrial contamination),B更符合
陷阱:B为迷惑项, terrestrial contamination并不等于nonbiological processes,陆地污染也有可能有生物参与;在此处举例是为了说明,降落在地球上时没有PAH,在地球上后,可能因为terrestrial contamination(可以是地球上生物的biological processes)最后才沾染上PAH
这题不难但是陷阱很恶心。。。
B的nonbiological processes原文一个字也没有提到
C就是OA 但是要仔细看 来地球之前没有 来了之后就有了 换句话说这个就是在地球上形成的不是在火星形成的
关于B,有些科学家说PAH可能来自terrestrial contamination(有可能来自地球上的生命活动)
nonbiological processes是下一个论点的东西,而且是M提出来支持自己观点的。
是被污染的说明了到达地球上时还没有PAH
Devilish Question, if u don't target V49-51, just ignore this.
meteorite ALH84001, which had beendiscovered in Antarctica in 1984.
its PAH's might have resulted from terrestrial contamination.
In other word, it's likely that it (Meteorite) does not possess PAH before it landed on earth (Antarctica).
B is trap. They don't claim any specific process. They just weaken rather than estabilish their own idea.
根据13000年定为到第二段段首,然后看到suggesting to some scientists that its PAH's might have resulted from terrestrial contamination,说PAH可能是从路地上感染的。也就是在说PAH有没有在陆地上出现的问题,只有C说的是这个问题
为什么不能选B 而要选C
B选项和C选项不都是陈述第二段话里面一些科学家认为PAH不是开始就包含在ALH84001里面吗
你说的都没错。但是呢,文章里没有说过这些PAHs来自于nonbiological processes。
逻辑!考的是逻辑!
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论