While there is no blueprint for transforming a largely government-controlled economy into a free one, the experience of the United Kingdom since 1979 clearly shows one approach that works: privatization, in which state - owned industries are sold to private companies. By 1979, the total borrowings and losses of state - owned industries were running at about£3 billion a year. By selling many of these industries, the government has decreased these borrowings and losses, gained over£34 billion from the sales, and now receives tax revenues from the newly privatized companies. Along with a dramatically improved overall economy, the government has been able to repay 12.5 percent of the net national debt over a two-year period.

In fact, privatization has not only rescued individual industries and a whole economy headed for disaster, but has also raised the level of performance in every area. At British Airways and British Gas, for example, productivity per employee has risen by 20 percent. At Associated British Ports, labor disruptions common in the 1970's and early 1980's have now virtually disappeared. At British Telecom, there is no longer a waiting list - as there always was before privatization - to have a telephone installed.

Part of this improved productivity has come about because the employees of privatized industries were given the opportunity to buy shares in their own companies. They responded enthusiastically to the offer of shares: at British Aerospace, 89 percent of the eligible work force bought shares; at Associated British Ports, 90 percent; and at British Telecom, 92 percent. When people have a personal stake in something, they think about it, care about it, work to make it prosper. At the National Freight Consortium, the new employee - owners grew so concerned about their company's profits that during wage negotiations they actually pressed their union to lower its wage demands.

Some economists have suggested that giving away free shares would provide a needed acceleration of the privatization process. Yet they miss Thomas Paine's point that"what we obtain too cheap we esteem too lightly. "In order for the far - ranging benefits of individual ownership to be achieved by owners' companies I and countries employees and other individuals must make their own decisions to buy, and they must commit some of their own resources to the choice.


Which of the following statements is most consistent with the principle described in highlight text?


A democratic government that decides it is inappropriate to own a particular industry has in no way abdicated its responsibilities as guard Jan of the public interest.

The ideal way for a government to protect employee interests is to force companies to maintain their share of a competitive market without government subsidies.

The failure to harness the power of self-interest is an important reason that state-owned industries perform poorly.

Governments that want to implement privatization programs must try to eliminate all resistance to the free-market system.

The individual shareholder will reap only a minute share of the gains from whatever sacrifices he or she makes to achieve these gains

考题讲解

此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。


正确答案是 C。选择 C 的理由是,文章指出,让员工拥有自己公司的股份可以提高生产率,而这种改善是因为员工有自己的利益,他们想要成功,所以他们会更加努力地工作,这也正是文章所说的“人们在自己受益的情况下会考虑、关心并努力使其发展壮大”的原则。

展开显示

登录注册 后可以参加讨论

快来第一个发言吧
OG2016V-RC