While there is no blueprint for transforming a largely government-controlled economy into a free one, the experience of the United Kingdom since 1979 clearly shows one approach that works: privatization, in which state - owned industries are sold to private companies. By 1979, the total borrowings and losses of state - owned industries were running at about£3 billion a year. By selling many of these industries, the government has decreased these borrowings and losses, gained over£34 billion from the sales, and now receives tax revenues from the newly privatized companies. Along with a dramatically improved overall economy, the government has been able to repay 12.5 percent of the net national debt over a two-year period.
In fact, privatization has not only rescued individual industries and a whole economy headed for disaster, but has also raised the level of performance in every area. At British Airways and British Gas, for example, productivity per employee has risen by 20 percent. At Associated British Ports, labor disruptions common in the 1970's and early 1980's have now virtually disappeared. At British Telecom, there is no longer a waiting list - as there always was before privatization - to have a telephone installed.
Part of this improved productivity has come about because the employees of privatized industries were given the opportunity to buy shares in their own companies. They responded enthusiastically to the offer of shares: at British Aerospace, 89 percent of the eligible work force bought shares; at Associated British Ports, 90 percent; and at British Telecom, 92 percent. When people have a personal stake in something, they think about it, care about it, work to make it prosper. At the National Freight Consortium, the new employee - owners grew so concerned about their company's profits that during wage negotiations they actually pressed their union to lower its wage demands.
Some economists have suggested that giving away free shares would provide a needed acceleration of the privatization process. Yet they miss Thomas Paine's point that"what we obtain too cheap we esteem too lightly. "In order for the far - ranging benefits of individual ownership to be achieved by owners' companies I and countries employees and other individuals must make their own decisions to buy, and they must commit some of their own resources to the choice.
Which of the following can be inferred from the passage about the privatization process in the United Kingdom?
It depends to a potentially dangerous degree on individual ownership of shares.
It conforms in its most general outlines to Thomas Paine's prescription for business ownership.
It was originally conceived to include some giving away of free shares.
It has been successful, even though privatization has failed in other countries.
It is taking place more slowly than some economists suggest is necessary.
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 D. 它已经成功,即使其他国家的私有化失败了。
根据阅读材料,自1979年以来英国的私有化进程取得了巨大成功。通过出售许多国有行业,政府减少了约3亿英镑的借款和损失,并从新私有化的公司获得了超过34亿英镑的销售收入,以及税收收入。整体经济显着改善,政府在两年内就还清了125%的国民债务。此外,私有化不仅拯救了经济正在陷入灾难的单个行业和整个经济,而且还提高了各个领域的绩效水平。因此,可以推断出,英国的私有化进程已经取得了成功,即使其他国家的私有化失败了,所以正确答案是 D. 它已经成功,即使其他国家的私有化失败了。
这题也太难定位了吧;
Support for the inference about the pace of
privatization is provided by the suggestion of some economists that giving away free
shares would provide a needed acceleration of the privatization process (lines 42–44).
If some economists think privatization needs to be accelerated, then it must be going
too slowly, at least according to these economists.