In a 1918 editorial, W.E.B. Du Bois advised African Americans to stop agitating for equality and to proclaim their solidarity with White Americans for the duration of the First World War. The editorial surprised many African Americans who viewed Du Bois as an uncompromising African American leader and a chief opponent of the accommodationist tactics urged by Booker, T.Washington. In fact, however, Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists such as William Trotter. In 1895, when Washington called on African Americans to concentrate on improving their communities instead of opposing discrimination and agitating for political rights, Du Bois praised Washington's speech. In 1903, however, Du Bois aligned himself with Trotter, Washington's militant opponent, less for ideological reasons than because Trotter had described to him Washington's efforts to silence those in the African American press who opposed Washington's positions.
Du Bois‘s wartime position thus reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure: government officials had threatened African American journalists with censorship if they continued to voice grievances. Furthermore, Du Bois believed that African Americans' contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political advances. Du Bois' accommodationism did not last, however. Upon learning of systematic discrimination experienced by African Americans in the military, he called on them to "return fighting" from the war.
The passage is primarily concerned with
identifying historical circumstances that led Du Bois to alter his long-term goals.
defining "accommodationism" and showing how Du Bois used this strategy to achieve certain goals
accounting for a particular position adopted by Du Bois during the First World War.
contesting the view that Du Bois was significantly influenced by either Washington or Trotter.
assessing the effectiveness of a strategy that Du Bois urged African Americans to adopt.
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 C。本文主要讨论的是邓布斯在一战期间改变了他一直以来的立场,而不是他以前所坚持的立场,即他从非对策者到让步者的过渡。文章提供了一些历史背景,比如政府官员威胁要审查那些在非裔美国人媒体上的反对华盛顿的声音。文章还提到了邓布斯认为,非裔美国人为这场战争做出的贡献也给他们带来了一些法律和政治上的进步。因此,本文主要讨论的是邓布斯在一战期间採用的特定立场,正确答案是 C。
这篇文章其实是在详细阐述DB在一战时为什么持有特定态度的来龙去脉。DB在一战的时候建议美国黑人群体停止平群运动而去和白人团体一同战斗来证明自己的团体。这个建议被报道出来后震惊了很多认为DB政治观点从不妥协的人(他们认为DB应该持续的号召黑人平权运动进展)。但其实DB的政治立场也不是一成不变的,他之前曾经支持过华盛顿,也曾经因为华盛顿给黑人媒体压力而站在他的对立面。
DB在战时的政治立场表明了他长期目标没有改变,而只是一个实用主义的回应;政府表示要对持续发出委屈声音的媒体人进行审查。并且,DB认为美国黑人在过去战争中的贡献应该已经推动了平权状况的进步。但是他的妥协主义并没有持续多久,因为他看到了黑人在一战中所受到的歧视,所以他号召大家继续为了平权而战斗。
long-term goal 一直没有改变
其实本文一直在说DB的position问题,选题选大意,C就如此。In fact, however, Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists such as William Trotter.