Milankovitch proposed in the early twentieth century that the ice ages were caused by variations in the Earth's orbit around the Sun. For some time this theory was considered untestable, largely because there was no sufficiently precise chronology of the ice ages with which the orbital variations could be matched.

To establish such a chronology it is necessary to determine the relative amounts of land ice that existed at various times in the Earth's past. A recent discovery makes such a determination possible: relative land-ice volume for a given period can be deduced from the ratio of two oxygen isotopes, 16 and 18, found in ocean sediments. Almost all the oxygen in water is oxygen 16, but a few molecules out of every thousand incorporate the heavier isotope 18. When an ice age begins, the continental ice sheets grow, steadily reducing the amount of water evaporated from the ocean that will eventually return to it. Because heavier isotopes tend to be left behind when water evaporates from the ocean surfaces, the remaining ocean water becomes progressively enriched in oxygen 18. The degree of enrichment can be determined by analyzing ocean sediments of the period, because these sediments are composed of calcium carbonate shells of marine organisms, shells that were constructed with oxygen atoms drawn from the surrounding ocean. The higher the ratio of oxygen 18 to oxygen 16 in a sedimentary specimen, the more land ice there was when the sediment was laid down.

As an indicator of shifts in the Earth's climate, the isotope record has two advantages. First, it is a global record: there is remarkably little variation in isotope ratios in sedimentary specimens taken from different continental locations. Second, it is a more continuous record than that taken from rocks on land. Because of these advantages, sedimentary evidence can be dated with sufficient accuracy by radiometric methods to establish a precise chronology of the ice ages. The dated isotope record shows that the fluctuations in global ice volume over the past several hundred thousand years have a pattern: an ice age occurs roughly once every 100,000 years. These data have established a strong connection between variations in the Earth's orbit and the periodicity of the ice ages. However, it is important to note that other factors, such as volcanic particulates or variations in the amount of sunlight received by the Earth, could potentially have affected the climate. The advantage of the Milankovitch theory is that it is testable; changes in the Earth's orbit can be calculated and dated by applying Newton's laws of gravity to progressively earlier configurations of the bodies in the solar system. Yet the lack of information about other possible factors affecting global climate does not make them unimportant.


The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about the Milankovitch theory?


It is the only possible explanation for the ice ages.

It is too limited to provide a plausible explanation for the ice ages, despite recent research findings.

It cannot be tested and confirmed until further research on volcanic activity is done.


It is one plausible explanation, though not the only one, for the ice ages.

It is not a plausible explanation for the ice ages, although it has opened up promising possibilities for future research.

考题讲解

题目分析:

文章推断题:关于M的理论,作者最有可能同意以下哪点?

选项分析:

A选项:它是唯一一个关于冰川时代的解释:最后一段提到有其他与因素还没被考虑,说明可能有其他的解释。

B选项:尽管有了新发现,但还是不足以提供一个关于冰川时代的合理解释:文章第三段提到新方法的优点,并认为它可以支持M的理论,所以尽管这个方法有缺点,但M理论还是可以算一个合理的解释解释。

C选项:直到完成对火山活动的研究,M的理论才可以被检测并证实:原文没有提到火山活动。

D选项:正确。
它是一个合理的解释,尽管不是唯一一个。

E选项:
虽然它提供了一些可能性,但它并不是一个合理的解释:它是一个合理的解释,但直到最近才有能力被检测。

展开显示

登录注册 后可以参加讨论

OG2017-RC