It is an odd but indisputable fact that the seventeenth-century English women who are generally regarded as among the forerunners of modern feminism are almost all identified with the Royalist side in the conflict between Royalists and Parliamentarians known as the English Civil Wars. Since Royalist ideology is often associated with the radical patriarchalism of seventeenth-century political theorist Robert Filmer—a patriarchalism that equates family and kingdom and asserts the divinely ordained absolute power of the king and, by analogy, of the male head of the household—historians have been understandably puzzled by the fact that Royalist women wrote the earliest extended criticisms of the absolute subordination of women in marriage and the earliest systematic assertions of women's rational and moral equality with men. Some historians have questioned the facile equation of Royalist ideology with Filmerian patriarchalism; and indeed, there may have been no consistent differences between Royalists and Parliamentarians on issues of family organization and women's political rights, but in that case one would expect early feminists to be equally divided between the two sides.
Catherine Gallagher argues that Royalism engendered feminism because the ideology of absolute monarchy provided a transition to an ideology of the absolute self. She cites the example of the notoriously eccentric author Margaret Cavendish (1626–1673), duchess of Newcastle. Cavendish claimed to be as ambitious as any woman could be, but knowing that as a woman she was excluded from the pursuit of power in the real world, she resolved to be mistress of her own world, the "immaterial world" that any person can create within her own mind—and, as a writer, on paper. In proclaiming what she called her "singularity," Cavendish insisted that she was a self-sufficient being within her mental empire, the center of her own subjective universe rather than a satellite orbiting a dominant male planet. In justifying this absolute singularity, Cavendish repeatedly invoked the model of the absolute monarch, a figure that became a metaphor for the self-enclosed, autonomous nature of the individual person. Cavendish's successors among early feminists retained her notion of woman's sovereign self, but they also sought to break free from the complete political and social isolation that her absolute singularity entailed.
The author of the passage refers to Robert Filmer (see in the highlighted text) primarily in order to
show that Royalist ideology was somewhat more radical than most historians appear to realize
qualify the claim that patriarchalism formed the basis of Royalist ideology
question the view that most early feminists were associated with the Royalist faction
highlight an apparent tension between Royalist ideology and the ideas of early feminists
argue that Royalists held conflicting opinions on issues of family organization and women's political rights
题目分析:
本文难度较大,在第一题这里,我们先分析一下文章的主旨结构:
It is an odd but indisputable fact that the seventeenth-century English women who are generally regarded as among the forerunners of modern feminism are almost all identified with the Royalist side in the conflict between Royalist and Parliamentarians known as the English Civil Wars.
现象:被普遍认为是现代女权主义先驱的17世纪英国女性,在英国内战保皇派和议会派的争斗中,被划到了保皇派的阵营中。
请注意作者这里对这个现象的定性:odd but indisputable 虽然奇怪但是不可辩驳的,意思就是这的确是一个事实,这些女性的确是保皇派。但odd的存在表明这是一个矛盾。
Since Royalist ideology is often associated with the radical patriarchalism of seventeenth-century political theorist Robert Filmer—a patriarchalism that equates family and kingdom and asserts the divinely ordained absolute power of the king and, by analogy, of the male headof the household—historians have been understandably puzzled by the fact that Royalist women wrote the earliest extended criticism of the absolute subordination of women in marriage and the earliest systematic assertions of women’s rational and moral equality with men.
进一步强化矛盾:保皇派的想法通常都和父权主义相关,但这些保皇派的女性却是第一批公开批评女性在婚姻中从属地位和系统性地主张男女平等的人。
Some historians have questioned the facile equation of Royalist ideology with Filmerian patriarchalism; and indeed, there may have been no consistent differences between Royalist and Parliamentarianson issues of family organization and women’s political rights, but in that case one would expect early feminists to be equally divided between the two sides.
作者对一种解释的评判:一些历史学家认为把保皇派理念和父权主义等同起来太轻率了,保皇派和议会派对家庭结构和女性政治权利的观念可能并不存在一贯的分歧。注意indeed是让步,更重要的是but后的内容,作者对这种解释的态度是否定的,因为如果的确是这样的话,这些女性也应该平均分布于两个阵营,但一开头讲过了,这些女性就是保皇派的,这是一个indisputable fact,所以这个解释并不成立。
Catherine Gallagher argues that Royalism engendered feminism because the ideology of absolute monarchy provided a transition to an ideology of the absolute self.
CG对这个看似矛盾现象的解释:之所以女权主义产生于保皇派是因为君主专制思想提供了向绝对自我思想的过渡。
文章的最后讲了一个例子,快速阅读即可。
选项分析:
A选项:文中没有提到此种比较。
B选项:并没有claim说父权主义是保皇派思想的基础,无中生有
C选项:作者开篇就说了早期女权主义者是保皇派这是一个不争的事实,所以RF并不是用来质疑这个事实的。
D选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
E选项:后文才提到保皇派可能并没有一致的观念,这里并没有这层意思。
全文逻辑:17c的女性主义者属于保皇派,而且和父权主义的关系也非常紧密,这是因为保皇派给女权主义提供了发展的空间
容易出现逻辑错误导致全文没有读懂:因为第一句在说一个矛盾,第二句还在说矛盾,还顺带解释了这个矛盾带来的后果,所以很容易误会成作者想要question矛盾的其中一方,然后后面的论点被“读成”了对某个观点的支持。
事实上,这篇文章就是现象解释,提出了一个大家都觉得很odd的现象,并解释了背后的原因。
C. odd but indisputable,奇怪但是并无争议,所以作者不是在questioning
D. 陈述了观点对立的点,正确
E. Royalist内部的分歧,错误
Tension.
女权是R派。R派ideology和男权有联系(details 男权强调家庭male head),因此让historian puzzle。【因为女权应该和R派的男权观点不合才对】
全文没看太懂,记得再回来做。
做题时的想法:
第一段:关于女权主义的起源有一个很odd的事情,和R和P有关。R有个F挺父权,然后R的女人挺女权。历史学家对于R的女子和F之间感到困惑?R和P差不多?
第二段:CG说R挺女权,举了一个人的例子叫MC,说她想控制自己的世界所以在内心打造了自己的世界,把这个叫做S。认为想说的是R父权太压抑了反而驱动女权意识的兴起。
第一句一个奇怪的理论,第二句解释为啥奇怪:因为保皇派和早期女权主张的并不一样。所以是d。我为什么错?这文章压根儿就没怎么读懂,连第二句是解释什么的都没搞清楚。
rc
无中生有,做多余假设;
odd but indisputable 虽然奇怪但是不可辩驳的
B选项:并没有claim说父权主义是保皇派思想的基础,无中生有
E选项:后文才提到保皇派可能并没有一致的观念,这里并没有这层意思。
错选E,没有理解选项。argue that Royalists held conflicting opinions 意思是royalists自己内部有不同的观点,而不是说royalist 和feminist有不同的观点
D: tension,对立;紧张
作者开篇就说了早期女权主义者是保皇派这是一个不争的事实,所以RF并不是用来质疑这个事实的。
为什么c里的question不能翻译成疑问,对这个观点表示疑问?
高亮部分解释的是父权主义 而保皇派的女性是女权主义的先驱 这里引出父权就是强调矛盾性
作用题:因为17世纪女性的被认为是早期女权先锋,而她们在独立战争中统一站队Royal side。又因为Royal side的思想经常和RF联系在一起:维护君主至高无上的权力,按此类推,维护一家之主(通常是男性)的权力。
提到RF是为了体现这种这些女性自己的思想和royal ideology的之间的冲突
用转折词可以判断出来:Since Royalist ideology is often associated with the radical patriarchalism , (前后产生矛盾才导致puzzle)historians have been understandably PUZZLED by the fact that blablablabla ///Some historians have QUESTIONED THE FACILE EQUATION of Royalist ideology with Filmerian patriarchalism. 大写两处都可推测出答案
错选B
tension 压力
记人名记主张 注意转折词
考试遇到这种题只能靠动词选择一个了
①文章中早就指出odd but indistputable,所以就不能去question这个结论
②文章一定要在最开始的时候就尽力体会文章内容,不然只会又浪费时间又没有作用
A选项:文中没提到
B选项:RF与这个royalism息息相关,他支持的是patriotism,并没办法证明patriotism是royalism的基础;同时目的也不是qualify the claim。
C选项:并没有提到任何质疑的证据;
D选项:RF的激进的爱国主义和对此提出质疑的女权主义者之间的明显的压力
E选项:后文才提到保皇派可能并没有一致的观念,这里并没有这层意思
大纲:第一段argument: 质疑英国royalism的女性是包含在最早的英国女权主义者中的在英国民主战争期间的议会制支持者和保皇派之间,论述原因,Royalism与爱国主义息息相关,而爱国主义的定义是被RF定义为:皇权和男性在国家和家庭同样的地位;17世纪的女性批评女性在家庭中的附属地位和女性的理性和道德上和男性一样的主张;历史学家对于RF的这个轻而易举下的定语迷惑着表示理解,并且承认女性这种在家庭和政治权利方面不连续的不同,这种情况下早期的女性必须在两边取一战队;
第二段论点:CG指出是royalism致使女权主义的诞生,CG就是一个臭名昭著的例子,因为无法完成政治诉求,她便将注意力集中在写作中建立一个精神王国,建立独立的君主。后人保留了精神独立的特点,摒弃了她在政治和社会上的完全孤立。
哎 6对4 难受
这篇文章是目前为止读到的最难的。