While the most abundant and dominant species within a particular ecosystem is often crucial in perpetuating the ecosystem, a "keystone" species, here defined as one whose effects are much larger than would be predicted from its abundance, can also play a vital role. But because complex species interactions may be involved, identifying a keystone species by removing the species and observing changes in the ecosystem is problematic. It might seem that certain traits would clearly define a species as a keystone species; for example, Pisaster ochraceus is often a keystone predator because it consumes and suppresses mussel populations, which in the absence of this starfish can be a dominant species. But such predation on a dominant or potentially dominant species occurs in systems that do as well as in systems that do not have species that play keystone roles. Moreover, whereas P. ochraceus occupies an unambiguous keystone role on wave-exposed rocky headlands, in more wave-sheltered habitats the impact of P. ochraceus predation is weak or nonexistent, and at certain sites sand burial is responsible for eliminating mussels. Keystone status appears to depend on context, whether of particular geography or of such factors as community diversity (for example, a reduction in species diversity may thrust more of the remaining species into keystone roles) and length of species interaction (since newly arrived species in particular may dramatically affect ecosystems).
Which of the following, if true, would most clearly support the argument about keystone status advanced in the last sentence of the passage (in the highlighted text)?
A species of bat is primarily responsible for keeping insect populations within an ecosystem low, and the size of the insect population in turn affects bird species within that ecosystem.
A species of iguana occupies a keystone role on certain tropical islands, but does not play that role on adjacent tropical islands that are inhabited by a greater number of animal species.
Close observation of a savannah ecosystem reveals that more species occupy keystone roles within that ecosystem than biologists had previously believed.
As a keystone species of bee becomes more abundant, it has a larger effect on the ecosystem it inhabits.
A species of moth that occupies a keystone role in a prairie habitat develops coloration patterns that camouflage it from potential predators.
题目分析:
文章推断题:以下哪个最支持文章最后一句话?
原文:keystone的地位看起来是取决于环境,或者是多样性(举个例子,物种多样性的减少会把更多剩下的物种推入到keystone的角色中),或者是物种间的互动(新到的物种会戏剧性的影响生态系统)。
选项分析:
A选项:某种蝙蝠负责控制生态系统里的昆虫数量在很低的水平,这种昆虫的数量又反过来影响鸟的数量:无关。
B选项:正确。在热带岛屿某种大蜥蜴是keystone,但他在相邻的一个有很多动物种类的热带岛屿就不是keystone了:原文提到,是不是keystone是取决于环境等多个因素,所以这个例子说明了换个环境,物种的角色就发生了变化。
C选项:对大草原生态系统的近距离观察揭示了:生态系统中的keystone数量比生物学家原以为的要多:无关。
D选项:随着某蜜蜂keystone的数量变多,它对所在栖息地的生态系统的影响也更大:最后一句话没有提到数量的影响。
E选项:在大草原栖息地上,一种作为keystone的蛾子进化出一种花色,用以伪装自己:无关。
主要在A和B之间的抉择,觉得有陷阱。
A最具吸引力的地方,是其例子(蝙蝠,昆虫和鸟)中动物之间互相制约和高亮处的关键词interaction很符合。
B在于两个地理位置中物种多样性的不同决定了iguana是否为keystone。但没有像A那样提及interaction。
但A选项完全忽略了最关键部分:A中没有提及任何一种动物是keystone,只提及了其互相制衡。
正确选项是环境决定keystone role
A选项是Keystone role影响环境,因果颠倒
OG——That the iguana is a keystone species in a location that has limited species diversity but not a keystone species in a
location that has greater species diversity suggests that keystone status does indeed depend on context.
为什么A不对呀?
高亮句表达了物种统治地位的发生条件:1. 地理环境 2.种群多样性 3.种群交互时间
B 提到了不同环境物种统治地位的不同,正确
逻辑题:信息定位文章最后一句。该句指出了影响identifying a keystone status 的三类因素,选项中有符合任何一类特点的都能support the argument. 对比选项,只有B符合第一类因素,geography
Keystone status appears to depend on context---抓住中心观点解题
地理有关,whether of particular geography