扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / OG2016-SC-57
Because an oversupply of computer chips has sent prices plunging, the manufacturer has announced that it will cut production by closing its factories for two days a month.
Because an oversupply of computer chips has sent prices plunging,
Because of plunging prices for computer chips, which is due to an oversupply,
Because computer chip prices have been sent plunging, which resulted from an oversupply,
Due to plunging computer chip prices from an oversupply,
Due to an oversupply, with the result that computer chip prices have been sent plunging,
题目分析：
本题中有些选项既有语法错误又有逻辑错误，通过两种方向皆可选出答案。
选项分析：
A选项：Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
B选项：because of是介词，身后的名词短语的核心词是prices。相较于选项(A)，两者的原因状语中的核心词是不同的。(A)中核心词为动词sent，本选项中核心词为prices。显然地，在逻辑上，能和未划线部分形成因果关系的是应该是“过分供给导致价格下降”这件事，而不是价格本身（如果不过过分供给导致的价格下降，那也就不用后面的减产了）。另外，which is due to an oversupply是一个定语从句，先行词需要是一个单数名词，但本选项中其身前没有单数名词。
C选项：which resulted from an oversupply是定语从句，其先行词为computer chip prices（只有这一个名词）。但在逻辑上，由于“过分供给”导致的应该是“价格下降”，而不是“价格”。
D选项：本选项原因状语的核心词错误同(B)。
E选项：本选项due to身后的核心词是an oversupply，但是，在逻辑上，制造商下降产量的原因是过分供给做的事情，也不是过分供给本身。
相关不等于因果,这里安全不提.难道是这个点现在不谈了?
删掉了。因为考题出现的数量较少。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
which is due to an oversupply是一个定语从句，先行词需要是一个单数名词，但本选项中其身前没有单数名词。
In (D), "due to plunging computer chip prices from an oversupply" presumably modifies the manufacturer, since that's the noun that follows. And that makes no sense at all: the manufacturer itself wasn't "due to plunging computer chip prices." (D) is gone.
This one is for you, warriorguy! Phrases that begin with "due to" can only modify nouns, not verbs. Here, have a couple of examples:
The game was postponed due to rain. --> Wrong, since the phrase "due to rain" modifies the verb phrase "was postponed." "Due to" phrases can only modify nouns.
Souvik's success on the GMAT was due to his hard work. --> Correct, since "due to his hard work" modifies the noun "success."
E due to 和with the result语义重复？ BC因为which直接拿掉
记得书上写过。第一句是句子的逻辑关系是因果。其他都是表示的相关关系。但是未划线部分表示是因果关系。所以只能选A
相关关系还是因果关系题
老师，A选项里，an oversupply...sent prices plunging....为什么是plunging而不是to plunge呢？Send 对plunge没有约束力吗？
之前看到过due to不能放句首，可以这样判断DE项吗？
老师C问解释有点不太理解诶，非限定定语从句不是可以修饰一个句子吗？如果这样的话可是直接修饰前面的句子而不用单独修饰名词computer chip price了呀。这道题被动语态没有问题吗？plugging可不可以理解为sent的宾补啊？
首先，非限定性定语从句只能修饰名词，不能修饰句子。人家都叫“定语”从句了，只有修饰名词的东西才能被称为是定语，修饰动词或者句子，就是状语了。第二，plunging确实是宾补，sent的被动语态本身是完全没有问题的。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
可以用相关不等于因果来做吗？
可以是可以。但是现在已经把这个考点拿掉啦～
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论