Thelonious Monk, who was a jazz pianist and composer, produced a body of work both rooted in the stride-piano tradition of Willie (The Lion) Smith and Duke Ellington, yet in many ways he stood apart from the mainstream jazz repertory.
Thelonious Monk, who was a jazz pianist and composer, produced a body of work both rooted
Thelonious Monk, the jazz pianist and composer, produced a body of work that was rooted both
Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk, who produced a body of work rooted
Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk produced a body of work that was rooted
Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk produced a body of work rooted both
题目分析:
在(A)(B)(E)中我们可以发现平行触发语both…and…,两者连接的内容需要在逻辑和语形上保持一致。
选项分析:
A选项:本选项的倒数第二个词出现了both。在英语中,在both身后有and的时候,它们连接的两者需要保证语法平行。本选项中both的身后是分词短语 rooted in the stride-piano tradition of Willie (The Lion) Smith,但是and身后只是第一个名词Duke Ellington,两者不平行(如果把and理解为连接两个名词的连词,则both就出现了搭配的错误,没有and作为搭配对象,在本题中也不能单独使用)。
who was a jazz pianist and composer是非限定性定语从句,其会让人读者认为Thelonious Monk仅在过去(was)是爵士乐钢琴家和作曲家。但在逻辑上,显然Thelonious Monk其实一直是钢琴家和作曲家,即,应该用同位语a jazz pianist and composer而不该用定语从句。
B选项:both…and…连接的两者在语法上不平行,错误同(A);
C选项:本选项没有谓语动词。
D选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
E选项:both…and…连接的两者在语法上不平行,错误同(A)。
后面and没有in,所有both排除,C没有核心动词,排除
both的出现没意义,since only one point is being made about where Monk’s musical roots are located.
后面and没有in,所有both排除,C没有核心动词,排除
both in ....and in...
后面and没有in,所有both排除,C没有核心动词,排除
Ron:"both rooted in... and in..." would still be non-parallel.
if "both" is followed by "rooted", then "and" MUST be followed by something parallel to "rooted".
Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk 这种说法也是对的
同位语or定语并不是考察点
关键还是看both的平行
who was a jazz pianist and composer是非限定性定语从句,其会让人读者认为Thelonious Monk仅在过去(was)是爵士乐钢琴家和作曲家。但在逻辑上,显然Thelonious Monk其实一直是钢琴家和作曲家,即,应该用同位语a jazz pianist and composer而不该用定语从句。
both的位置问题
C没有谓语不对有both的都不要所以就剩下了D
both and的平行,以及句子结构的完整,谓语存在与否的考察
who was a jazz pianist and composer是非限定性定语从句,其会让人读者认为Thelonious Monk仅在过去(was)是爵士乐钢琴家和作曲家.
注意both平行
"both rooted in... and in..." would still be non-parallel.
if "both" is followed by "rooted", then "and" MUST be followed by something parallel to "rooted".
both语法及语义上的平行要严格遵守,不能得过且过的看!
1.who was a jazz pianist and composer是非限定性定语从句,其会让人读者认为Thelonious Monk仅在过去(was)是爵士乐钢琴家和作曲家。但在逻辑上,显然Thelonious Monk其实一直是钢琴家和作曲家,即,应该用同位语a jazz pianist and composer而不该用定语从句。
2.both…and…连接的两者在语法上不平行
e,见到both,想平行
both and 严格平行,这里不平行。 尤其没加介词。
Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk 这种说法也是对的
只要不平行一定排出
both and 严格平行,这里不平行。 尤其没加介词。
Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk 这种说法也是对的
1.both...and...平行触发,形式和语义绝对平行;
2. 定语从句 vs. 同位语:注意定语从句的细节,如was
both…and的问题没有看仔细,只看到A