In setting environmental standards for industry and others to meet, it is inadvisable to require the best results that state-of-the-art technology can achieve. Current technology is able to detect and eliminate even extremely minute amounts of contaminants, but at a cost that is exorbitant relative to the improvement achieved. So it would be reasonable instead to set standards by taking into account all of the current and future risks involved.
The argument given concerning the reasonable way to set standards presupposes that
industry currently meets the standards that have been set by environmental authorities
there are effective ways to take into account all of the relevant risks posed by allowing different levels of contaminants
the only contaminants worth measuring are generated by industry
it is not costly to prevent large amounts of contaminants from entering the environment
minute amounts of some contaminants can be poisonous
为什么D不对呢,D可以被当做是方案的副作用:控制大量的污染也非常costly(因为没有最好的技术把tiny的污染物也给排除)。求解!
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论