In setting environmental standards for industry and others to meet, it is inadvisable to require the best results that state-of-the-art technology can achieve. Current technology is able to detect and eliminate even extremely minute amounts of contaminants, but at a cost that is exorbitant relative to the improvement achieved. So it would be reasonable instead to set standards by taking into account all of the current and future risks involved.
The argument given concerning the reasonable way to set standards presupposes that
industry currently meets the standards that have been set by environmental authorities
there are effective ways to take into account all of the relevant risks posed by allowing different levels of contaminants
the only contaminants worth measuring are generated by industry
it is not costly to prevent large amounts of contaminants from entering the environment
minute amounts of some contaminants can be poisonous
求问: So it would be reasonable instead to set standards by taking into account all of the current and future risks involved. 最后的这个问题真的读不懂,instead在这里应该怎么理解?
instead依然是取代啊。
因此,合理地来说,应该取代当前这种把现在和未来风险都包含进去的标准设定。
不不不,这里instead可以不翻译,不是取代得意思
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论